Children who grow up in families which are short of money are better prepared with the problems of adult life than children who are brought up by wealthy parents. Agree or disagree.
It is argued those children who are raised by parents having low income are more likely to be well-prepared for the obstacles in the future compared to those who are brought up in rich families. This essay completely agrees with this statement due to the fact young ones whose guardians have moderate salaries become more successful in life and learn money management skills.
Youngsters who grown up in middle-class families have more chances to succeed. Children learn most of the things at their earlier stage of life by spending time with family as they grasp easily the habits and things that their parents do and try to imitate those in their real life. They see their birth givers working hard and the way by which they fulfill basic needs of life which motivate growing buds to do work well and earn a lot of money so that they become financially developed. For example, Ibrahim LinkedIn belonged to the poor and become president of America by working hard to eliminate the poverty of his family.
Budding minds who belong to families having less money are good at money management. Most of the youngsters who had to adjust in their childhood for everything are better at managing funds as they have developed the habit of saving money by avoiding unnecessary things which are absent in those who always shell out money on enjoyment such as going to pubs, clubs, and tours with friends as they did not ever feel the need to think before spending money because they always have plentiful. A recent study has shown that students who have financial support from parents are not good at managing business costs and profits.
In conclusion, I strongly agree that young ones having poor family backgrounds are more successful in life because of having good financial management skills and the ability to work hard.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-07-19 | JJsidhu | 73 | view |
| 2020-07-16 | Dimple7 | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-13 | Jass kahlon | 73 | view |
| 2019-07-03 | coolchris2100 | 78 | view |
| 2019-02-26 | bhatvishal@ | 77 | view |
- You live in a room in college which you share with another student However there are many problems with this arrangement and you find it very difficult to study work Write a letter to the accommodation officer at the college In the letter describe the sit 73
- People in the community can buy cheaper products nowadays Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 78
- Today the quality of life in large cities is decreasing Discuss the causes and solutions 78
- Many museums charge for admission while others are free Do you think the advantages of charging people for admission to museums outweigh the disadvantages 73
- Some people consider price as the most important thing to consider when buying a product such as a cell phone and services like medical treatment Do you agree or disagree 78
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, well, for example, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1515.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 311.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87138263666 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19942759058 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41065791759 2.80592935109 86% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.540192926045 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 469.8 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 20.2975951904 153% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 86.8092161006 49.4020404114 176% => OK
Chars per sentence: 151.5 106.682146367 142% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.1 20.7667163134 150% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.9 7.06120827912 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.273583184321 0.244688304435 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111294751821 0.084324248473 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0641237823689 0.0667982634062 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162490142713 0.151304729494 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0635366772727 0.056905535591 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.47 50.2224549098 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.56 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.47 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.1190380762 142% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, well, for example, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1515.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 311.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87138263666 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19942759058 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41065791759 2.80592935109 86% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.540192926045 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 469.8 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 20.2975951904 153% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 86.8092161006 49.4020404114 176% => OK
Chars per sentence: 151.5 106.682146367 142% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.1 20.7667163134 150% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.9 7.06120827912 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.273583184321 0.244688304435 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111294751821 0.084324248473 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0641237823689 0.0667982634062 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162490142713 0.151304729494 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0635366772727 0.056905535591 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.47 50.2224549098 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.56 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.47 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.1190380762 142% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.