Countries are becoming more and more similar because people are able to buy the same products anywhere in the world. Do you think this is a positive or negative development?
Nowadays, globalization has been playing a vital role in mankind’s modern life. People from remote corner of the world can easily be acknowledge with the other or opposite parts of the world along with similar quality products that certainly aid as benefits. However cultural uniquity can be lost as a consequence of similar products availability and consumption. While both positive and negative development associated with the same product concept, I am of the opinion that it brings harmony all around the world.
Purchasing similar products remove the barrier of cultures which is one of the top-notch advantageous impact in the society. One can easily be able to know the history of their neighbouring nations which eventually build a supportive relation between them. For example, Bangladesh is world largest exporter of clothes throughout the world and people purchase those clothes which carry the cultural value of the Bangladeshi people. Additionally, every individual of all developing, developed and lower incoming country can buy the same quality product as there is no discrimination exists in globalization concept.
Despite the benefits, an obvious drawback of the development, however, is destruction of a tradition. Sometimes the attractive advertisement and easy publicity option because of modern technology, bring huge demand of product that is not of country’s culture. Therefore, the new product often replace the country’s own product that eventually on the verge of extinct. A recent study on the uses of earthenware among the Bangladeshi people showed significant decline of 82% as the rising of glassware. Though, this issue can easily be addressed through proper authorizing the arts and thus pose a minor threat to the positive aspects.
In conclusion, one global concept with similar product availability has been an increasing concept among people to learn the world’s different culture by conserving their own primitive value with proper management. Thus, in my belief positive development can outraced the negative aspects of purchasing similar utensils.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-01 | trpg143 | 89 | view |
| 2023-12-19 | minhnhat230602 | 73 | view |
| 2023-12-19 | minhnhat230602 | 73 | view |
| 2023-12-19 | minhnhat230602 | 67 | view |
| 2023-09-05 | Nowshin Tabassum | 89 | view |
- Many museums charge for admission while others are free Do you think the advantages of charging people for admission to museums outweigh the disadvantages 67
- Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future such as those related to science and technology Discuss both these views and 73
- Around the world many adults are working from home and more children are beginning to study from home because technology has become cheaper and more accessible Do you think this is a positive or negative development 73
- 1 Studies suggest that many teenagers these days prefer socialising online to meeting one another in person Why do you think this is the case What measures could be taken to encourage teenagers to spend more time meeting one another in person 73
- Countries are becoming more and more similar because people are able to buy the same products anywhere in the world Do you think this is a positive or negative development 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 326, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'products'' or 'product's'?
Suggestion: products'; product's
...can be lost as a consequence of similar products availability and consumption. While bot...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, then, therefore, thus, while, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1782.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 319.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.58620689655 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22617688928 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04437298584 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.586206896552 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 564.3 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.0293707349 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.8 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2666666667 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.86666666667 7.06120827912 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.251041180098 0.244688304435 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0791384976252 0.084324248473 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0516982105587 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153505597418 0.151304729494 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0201537757977 0.056905535591 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.14 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.78 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.