People think that government should increase the cost of fuel for cars and other
vehicles to solve environmental problems. Give your opinion.
There is currently a contentious argument over whether the government should impose increments in the fuel for cars and other vehicles in order to mitigate the emerging devastating environment. In my point of view, I would rather opt for other effective measures to these problems.
There are multiple compelling reasons as to why I don’t see eye to eye with this opinion. The first justification is that the underprivileged are not able to handle the staple in the house including the cost of fuel; hence, they were not capable of commuting to work or school by car, which bridging their relaxation opportunity in the background of hustle and bustle environment. Secondly, the increase in the cost of fuel exerts a bitter impact on society’s economic growth. If the fuel is too expensive to afford, there will be fewer people who choose that source of energy to be the main motivation for the car’s motor, resulting in the disappearance of the fuel together with the downward trend of economic growth.
On top of the aforementioned drawbacks, the growth in fuel cost also plays a pivotal role in alleviating the environmental problems. Once the fuel bill goes up, the number of car journeys will reduce substantially, which means there are fewer carbon footprints emitted in the environment. Whereas the officials could make use of the spare money contributed by the increment of fuel to make progress in the revolution of public transports.
In conclusion, instead of using this method as a way to improve the environment; in fact, there are more promising and efficient measures to this issue. Given this situation, it seems that the government should limit the time in the day of using vehicles. Meanwhile, every individual should take environmental vicinity into account and be discipline to yourself.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-25 | kashyap sahil | 56 | view |
| 2023-09-07 | huy ha | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-28 | Phuong1810 | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-28 | Phuong1810 | 78 | view |
| 2023-07-28 | Amanda158 | 61 | view |
- The charts below show the proportion of people s spending on different commodities and services in a particular European country in 1958 and 2008 84
- The line graph shows the percentage of New Zealand s population from 1950 to 2050 73
- The graph shows the number of marriages and divorces in the UK between 1975 and 2000 84
- The chart below shows the results of a British survey taken in 2005 related to the housing preferences of people in the UK 67
- People think that government should increase the cost of fuel for cars and other vehicles to solve environmental problems Give your opinion 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 290, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... footprints emitted in the environment. Whereas the officials could make use of the spa...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, if, second, secondly, so, whereas, while, as to, in conclusion, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1526.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 298.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12080536913 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01137432054 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587248322148 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 474.3 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.3308423407 49.4020404114 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.166666667 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8333333333 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06120827912 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.31623182953 0.244688304435 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0989508582038 0.084324248473 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0663938825699 0.0667982634062 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171611164184 0.151304729494 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0645550338193 0.056905535591 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.96 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.