The use of social media is replacing face-to-face interaction among many people in society. Do you think the advantages outweigh the advantages?
It is true that social media sites are popularly used for communicating purpose and they are expected to substitute the direct communication. From my perspectives, despite the existence of drawbacks, I would argue that advantages are way more significant.
On the one hand, it can not be denied that social networks is gradually dominating other forms of communication including face-to-face communication. First of all, people in all over the world are getting closer and stay updated with each other thank to social media, regardless of geographical distance. In the past, it would be time-consuming and annoying as well if a person needed to send a letter or announce news to someone in the faraway place owing to the fact that he had to trade for a long way in long hours. Nevertheless, now, it is relatively comfortable and convenient for individuals to send letters through email and exchange information via texting. Furthermore, in specific cases, social media can be considered as a situational solution instead of direct communication. For example, during the COVID-19 pandemic, while going out and having face-to-face interaction at the classroom, which is extremely hazardous due to the exposure to the virus, various schools resort to different communicating apps such as Zoom or Microsoft teams to organize online classes for students so that they can maintain their study even if they are in quarantine.
On the other hand, the drawbacks of the usage of social media can not be ignored. First, the overuse of social networks might weaken the users’s interaction with real people in real life. This is mainly because if they spend most of their time making online friends, it will be hard for them to find someone trustworthy in their actual life and they might let themselves be isolated from participating in any social relationships, leading to a variety of negative behaviours such as frustrated or monotonous. In addition, the virtual environment potentially maintains the great number of dangers which is difficult to tackle if unexpected things happen in real life. For example, during the social distancing time, the online bullying and harrassment are getting much more serious, also, more individuals use unclear account on the Internet to criticize or make fun of someone they detest, that results in the imbalance between their virtual activities and the moral behaviour in the society and triggers different mental disorder such as depression.
In conclusion, it would be remiss if 2 disadvantages of social networks were not mentioned . However, with the improvement of the awareness of those negative sides, I am sure that social media can help users gain more benefits of communication and disadvantages.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-02-22 | minhlamnguyen1204 | 73 | view |
| 2021-09-03 | linh thao | 67 | view |
| 2020-12-23 | nam.phanthanh97 | 56 | view |
| 2020-10-27 | nhibinhbinh | 90 | view |
| 2020-10-26 | Tuan Harry | 84 | view |
- The table below gives information about the values of exports of kiwi fruit from New Zealand to five countries between 2010 and 2012 61
- The diagram below shows how ethanol fuel is produced from corn
- The use of social media is replacing face to face interaction among many people in society Do you think the advantages outweigh the advantages 67
- Online shopping is increasing dramatically How could this trend affect our environment and the kinks of jobs required 84
- The diagram below shows how ethanol fuel is produced from corn
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 91, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...es of social networks were not mentioned . However, with the improvement of the aw...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, however, if, nevertheless, so, well, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as, first of all, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 64.0 41.998997996 152% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2305.0 1615.20841683 143% => OK
No of words: 438.0 315.596192385 139% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26255707763 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57476223824 4.20363070211 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.085427929 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 243.0 176.041082164 138% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.554794520548 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 726.3 506.74238477 143% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.76152304609 231% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 29.0 20.2975951904 143% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 94.7322308169 49.4020404114 192% => OK
Chars per sentence: 153.666666667 106.682146367 144% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.2 20.7667163134 141% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.8666666667 7.06120827912 154% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.170814476187 0.244688304435 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0584892702286 0.084324248473 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0408899791097 0.0667982634062 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101923831848 0.151304729494 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0296011796214 0.056905535591 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.9 13.0946893788 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.58 50.2224549098 67% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 11.3001002004 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.82 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.47 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 122.0 78.4519038076 156% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.1190380762 134% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.