Some people think that the government should give financial support to artists such as musicians, painters, and poets. Others think that it is a waste of money. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
In recent decades, the question of whether the government should support money for artists has become a topic of discussion. Although some oppose this idea because it’s seemingly unnecessary, this is one of the beneficial ways to spend government money.
There are a number of reasons why some suggest that the government should give money to artists such as musicians, painters, poets.
First, the arts sector plays an important role in the country’s tourism development. For example, Fine Arts Museum in Ho Chi Minh City is one of the most famous tourist destinations, attracting thousands of tourists around the world every year to enjoy works of art such as paintings, sculptures, traditional crafts. As a result, the government earns a huge amount of money, contributing to the country’s economic development.
Second, without financial support from the government, artists would face various difficulties to pursue their careers due to they don’t have enough financial ability. This means that a myriad of people are forced to take a low-paid job or are unemployed, causing various social problems such as attending illegal activities and violent attacks.
There are also a number of reasons why some think that it is a waste of money.
Inventing more money in the arts sector could lead to an imbalance in government spending, which could have a negative effect on other vital sectors such as education and healthcare. Governments should offer financial assistance to healthcare so that they have enough funding to cure those people who are suffering from fatal health problems like heart attack and cancer without economic condition.
Another reason is that government intervention could cause various issues to society. This is mitigating artist’s creation and work productivity due to they rely heavily on financial assistance without effort to hard work.
In conclusion, financial support from governments has both negative and positive effects, so governments should consider their spending to make the best solution.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-09-07 | quynhnhu1921996 | 78 | view |
- In many countries more and more people choose to buy imported food rather than food produced locally Why do people buy imported food What could be done to encourage people to buy local food 70
- Every day millions of tons of food are wasted all over the world Why do you think this is happening and how can solve this problem 80
- Research has shown that overeating is as harmful as smoking Therefore the advertising of certain food products should be banned in the same way as the advertising of cigarettes in some countries To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- nowadays people waste a lot of food that was bought from shops and restaurants why do you think people waste food what can be done to reduce the amount of food that throw away 80
- in some countries governments are encouraging industries and businesses to move out of the cities and into regional areas Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 20, Rule ID: WHETHER[3]
Message: Wordiness: Shorten this phrase to the shortest possible suggestion.
Suggestion: whether; the question whether
In recent decades, the question of whether the government should support money for...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 12, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'arts'' or 'art's'?
Suggestion: arts'; art's
...musicians, painters, poets. First, the arts sector plays an important role in the c...
^^^^
Line 6, column 29, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'arts'' or 'art's'?
Suggestion: arts'; art's
... of money. Inventing more money in the arts sector could lead to an imbalance in go...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, so, for example, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1729.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 318.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.43710691824 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22286093782 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86151254143 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584905660377 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 519.3 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.6558219905 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.5 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7142857143 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.85714285714 7.06120827912 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 8.0 4.38176352705 183% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.283661047948 0.244688304435 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0949102065012 0.084324248473 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0732941544067 0.0667982634062 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137115492075 0.151304729494 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.071252006597 0.056905535591 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.57 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.3 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.