Research has shown that overeating is as harmful as smoking. Therefore, the advertising of certain food products should be banned in the same way as the advertising of cigarettes in some countries. To what extent do you agree or disagree.
In recent years, overconsuming food products has been receiving a great deal of media attention around the world for many reasons. Although, some might suggest that food advertising programmes should be banned like cigarettes due to they have an adverse impact on society. The suggestion is groundless and should not be implemented.
There are a number of reasons why some think that the advertising of food products should be prohibited.
First, these days people are easy to find various forms of advertisements on the road, the internet with vivid images to attract customers and bring much more revenue for businesses. This means that it encourages people to spend enormous money to make unnecessary shopping choices, leading to financial stress, credit card debt, and other money-relative issues.
Second, if people consume too much fast food like hamburgers, pizza, which could be detrimental to their health, causing various health problems like high blood pressure, stroke, heart attack, or even cancer.
There is also a myriad of reasons why some oppose banning TV commercial programmes.
It is clear that the advertising industry is improved significantly in recent decades, creating a wide range of job opportunities for people, they are more likely to earn a stable income, which can help them improve their living standard. If governments remove advertising, people would face various difficulties to earn a well-paid job, force them to take a low-paid job, or even unemployment.
Another reason is that advertising can raise people’s awareness and knowledge about product development and they could make better shopping choices. For example, thanks to watching TV commercials about different brands of shampoo products, clients could choose the best products for them.
In conclusion, although advertising could have a detrimental impact on society, it brings more positive effects overall. Government should consider making the best solution.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-09-01 | quynhnhu1921996 | 84 | view |
| 2021-08-05 | FineSsa | 78 | view |
| 2020-08-16 | Emmaaa | 73 | view |
| 2020-06-05 | Hương Giang | 47 | view |
| 2019-07-28 | Thu Phung | 73 | view |
- nowadays people waste a lot of food that was bought from shops and restaurants why do you think people waste food what can be done to reduce the amount of food that throw away 80
- Every day millions of tons of food are wasted all over the world Why do you think this is happening and how can solve this problem 80
- Research has shown that overeating is as harmful as smoking Therefore the advertising of certain food products should be banned in the same way as the advertising of cigarettes in some countries To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Some people think that the government should give financial support to artists such as musicians painters and poets Others think that it is a waste of money Discuss both views and give your opinion 78
- In many countries more and more people choose to buy imported food rather than food produced locally Why do people buy imported food What could be done to encourage people to buy local food 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 132, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Although” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...tion around the world for many reasons. Although, some might suggest that food advertisi...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, second, so, well, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1668.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 301.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.5415282392 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89759282746 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.644518272425 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 491.4 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.4653142556 49.4020404114 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.142857143 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.35714285714 7.06120827912 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 8.0 4.38176352705 183% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.180262241761 0.244688304435 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0723122790286 0.084324248473 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0739848364074 0.0667982634062 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0955255891505 0.151304729494 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0836380487649 0.056905535591 147% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.85 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.35 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.