The graph below gives information about the percentage of people living in Australia who were born in Asia, the UK, and other regions.
The presented line chart illustrates the percentage of Australians born in different parts of the world from 1976 to 2011. The initial impression from the graph is that the figures for Asia and other regions witnessed upward trends over the given period while that for the UK experienced a decline. Moreover, the total population saw a small decrease in the first 25 years before recovering rapidly in the final ten years.
The percentage of Australians born in the UK stayed well-beyond the others at nearly 14% in 1976. Following that was the other regions with about 11 per cent, and the data of Asia was under-neath at just above 2.5%. Over 35 years, while fewer Australians came from the UK with its figure dropping to 5% in 2011, more Australians from Asia live in Australia with its data climbing up to 15%. Regarding the figure for other regions, it bottomed out at nearly 7.5% in 1986 before peaking at approximately 15%in 2006 but later dipping slightly at around 13% in 2011. In terms of the total population, it experienced a gradual drop from 22.5% in 1976 to its all-time low of about 20% in 2001, then another leap from 2001 to 2011 at 25%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-10-04 | myduyen282 | 73 | view |
| 2022-04-16 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2022-04-16 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2022-04-08 | Giang Tran | 67 | view |
| 2022-04-08 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
- Computers do help children to learn more effectively On the contrary their usage has a negative effect on both the physical and mental development of young people To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- The diagram shows the process of making orange juice 84
- Some people think that with the increasing use of mobile phones and computers people lose the ability to communicate face to face To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- The graph below gives information about coffee production in 4 different countries from 1990 to 2010 78
- Developments in science and technology have caused environmental problems Some people think that a simpler way of life will protect the environment while others believe that science and technology can solve environmental problems Discuss both views and gi 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, moreover, regarding, then, well, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 52.0 33.7804878049 154% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 955.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 204.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.68137254902 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77926670891 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57976834792 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 106.607317073 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.588235294118 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 271.8 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.6350194027 43.030603864 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.375 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5 22.9334400587 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.75 5.23603664747 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.185836881969 0.215688989381 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0846326906697 0.103423049105 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0604919998528 0.0843802449381 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148829088768 0.15604864568 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00522114406633 0.0819641961636 6% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 71.48 61.2550243902 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.16 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.97 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.