Crime rates will fall as advances in technology make it easier to detect and prevent crimes.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Growing criminality causing disturbance peace progressively becomes significant threat of numerous countries. Technological development is modern expectation in confrontation with perpetrators. If we look far into future, we will see law enforcement bored without cases, life secure and pleasant, but new kind of offences will stil be integral dark part of human society.
As desires constantly lead to harmful and distracting and impulsive actions, human mind tries to find out more subtle ways of realisation their eagerness. Nowadays undoubtedly appeared distinctive safe arsenal: cameras, alarms, sensors, detectors, entire new methods of spying. But criminal world evolves too. Current crimes could easily be a spectacular story of creative writer in the past. Besides cybercrime consists global crimes such as terrorism and rule of dictators. These problems cannot be solved with new device.
We don’t expect to see advanced technological progress in third world countries. The reason behind this is deep and comprehensive connection between all spheres of life. In process of social, economical, political and cultural development improves welfare and builds befitting conditions for creating innovations. Furthermore, in more economically developed countries crimes are prevented by legal-social (социально-правовой?) control. In such situation it is not necessary to break the law to get what you want or need. But even in utopian great and fear world will be good and bad people because the connection is complicated, and the fairest law doesn’t exclude dissents.
In conclusion, enhancement of control as result of technology progress isn’t a guarantee of crime purge, but in distant future it can cause a remarkable reduction precedents. Still it would be arrogant to be so sure that human intelligence could manage to overcome negative manifestation of itself. 47
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-22 | Dharti Patel | 84 | view |
| 2023-06-22 | Dharti Patel | 84 | view |
| 2023-05-30 | jay1451 | 78 | view |
| 2022-01-30 | sonnn | 89 | view |
| 2022-01-04 | sonnguyen | 89 | view |
- Some feel governments rather than private companies should be in charge of medical services To what extent do you agree or disagree 68
- Some think that current generation should take steps to protect the environment for the next generation Do you agree or disagree 89
- Many people think technological devices such as smartphones tablets and mobile phones bring more disadvantages than advantages To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Modern technology is now very common in most workplaces Do you think the advantages of this outweigh disadvantages 11
- Some people say that smoking should be banned in all public places even though it would restrict some of other people s freedoms Do you agree or disagree 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 426, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Control
...ted by legal-social социально-правовой? control. In such situation it is not necessary ...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 176, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Still,
...ause a remarkable reduction precedents. Still it would be arrogant to be so sure that...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 221, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... it would be arrogant to be so sure that human intelligence could manage to overc...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, furthermore, if, look, so, still, third, in conclusion, kind of, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 7.30460921844 14% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1627.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 280.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.81071428571 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.63215339232 2.80592935109 129% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.714285714286 0.561755894193 127% => OK
syllable_count: 491.4 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.1957097911 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.7058823529 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.4705882353 20.7667163134 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.05882352941 7.06120827912 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.136645553809 0.244688304435 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0391711207336 0.084324248473 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0426430979864 0.0667982634062 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0745785734277 0.151304729494 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0276128091333 0.056905535591 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.31 50.2224549098 76% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.12 12.4159519038 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.69 8.58950901804 124% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 78.4519038076 141% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.