People should undertake risky action only after they have carefully considered its consequences.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
Every action people undertake always affect themselves, people around them and the environment as well. Therefore, it is acceptable that people should involve in risky actions only after carefully examining and understanding the consequences. It will help for the safety of everyone and may avoid any devastating losses. However, there might be situations where people might not have enough time to think about the consequences of their actions and perform the act. Perhaps they might have to act or respond immediately and be involved in some risky actions, which might bring positive or negative consequences. Thus, there should be a balance in analyzing the consequences of risky actions before involving in them and immediate engagement in such activities, which is highly contingent upon the circumstances.
To begin with, whenever enough time is available to make decisions on performing an action, it is always recommended to examine the consequences carefully. For instance, think about hiking on a steep mountain which is labelled as one of the risky mountains by previous hikers. In planning such an action, enough time will be there to analyze the nature of the risk. Sometimes, the risk may not be too serious. Even if a person slips while climbing, he may escape with minor injuries. Otherwise, slipping might end in death, which is too serious. Considering these factors, the experience in hiking, and the available safety measures, the group of people planning for the trip should make a careful decision. If not, it may end up in severe losses that may not be recovered at any cost. This example shows that how important to analyze the nature and consequences of risky actions before getting involved in them.
However, there might be scenarios where risky actions have to be performed immediately, leaving no time to even think about them. Consider a team of firemen reaching out to a burning apartment to rescue the people. At the time they reach out to the location, the fire might be in either controllable or uncontrollable condition. If anybody is inside the building and in serious danger, the rescuing team has to involve in a risky action without thinking about the consequences. Perhaps, they might be able to save the person inside the building, or all of them might be trapped inside the building, minor or serious injuries might occur. Despite these concerns, firefighters are expected to perform their duty on time. This example shows that there are situations in which risky actions have to be performed without any analysis.
Every action we perform might end up as a boon or a bane. Especially, risky actions have a high probability of ending up with unfavorable consequences. Therefore, it is highly recommended to be aware of the consequences of actions everyone performs. Unless there are any motives or obligations to perform a risky action, it is always advisable to avoid risky actions that might put anyone's life in peril. Despite these precautions, it is also important to perform some risky actions which are necessary for some favorable outcomes. In a nutshell, an appropriate balance in analyzing the consequences of risky actions is required before performing them.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-04-07 | guozhishan | 50 | view |
| 2023-06-06 | ice123 | 58 | view |
| 2022-09-30 | YACHI PATEL | 50 | view |
| 2022-08-24 | Sujan Adhikari | 70 | view |
| 2022-08-04 | Tee_Jay | 33 | view |
- The following appeared as part of a business plan developed by the manager of the Rialto Movie Theater Despite its downtown location the Rialto Movie Theater a local institution for five decades must make big changes or close its doors forever It should f 55
- The following appeared in a health newsletter A ten year nationwide study of the effectiveness of wearing a helmet while bicycling indicates that ten years ago approximately 35 percent of all bicyclists reported wearing helmets whereas today that number i 70
- Learning is primarily a matter of personal discipline students cannot be motivated by school or college alone Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position yo 50
- People should undertake risky action only after they have carefully considered its consequences Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take In 50
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 106, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'recommended examining'.
Suggestion: recommended examining
...s on performing an action, it is always recommended to examine the consequences carefully. For instanc...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 176, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'recommended being'.
Suggestion: recommended being
...e consequences. Therefore, it is highly recommended to be aware of the consequences of actions ev...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, may, so, therefore, thus, well, while, as to, for instance, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 28.0 19.5258426966 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 22.0 12.4196629213 177% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 33.0505617978 94% => OK
Preposition: 82.0 58.6224719101 140% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2691.0 2235.4752809 120% => OK
No of words: 523.0 442.535393258 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14531548757 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.78217453174 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87756236305 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 227.0 215.323595506 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.434034416826 0.4932671777 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 873.9 704.065955056 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 6.24550561798 176% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 28.0 20.2370786517 138% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.8543742039 60.3974514979 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.1071428571 118.986275619 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6785714286 23.4991977007 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.28571428571 5.21951772744 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 15.0 5.13820224719 292% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.207891492502 0.243740707755 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.067074764344 0.0831039109588 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.046060347561 0.0758088955206 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150860146143 0.150359130593 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0505022534622 0.0667264976115 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 14.1392134831 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 48.8420337079 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 12.1639044944 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.03 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 100.480337079 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 106, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'recommended examining'.
Suggestion: recommended examining
...s on performing an action, it is always recommended to examine the consequences carefully. For instanc...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 176, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'recommended being'.
Suggestion: recommended being
...e consequences. Therefore, it is highly recommended to be aware of the consequences of actions ev...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, may, so, therefore, thus, well, while, as to, for instance, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 28.0 19.5258426966 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 22.0 12.4196629213 177% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 33.0505617978 94% => OK
Preposition: 82.0 58.6224719101 140% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2691.0 2235.4752809 120% => OK
No of words: 523.0 442.535393258 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14531548757 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.78217453174 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87756236305 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 227.0 215.323595506 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.434034416826 0.4932671777 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 873.9 704.065955056 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 6.24550561798 176% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 28.0 20.2370786517 138% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.8543742039 60.3974514979 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.1071428571 118.986275619 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6785714286 23.4991977007 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.28571428571 5.21951772744 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 15.0 5.13820224719 292% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.207891492502 0.243740707755 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.067074764344 0.0831039109588 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.046060347561 0.0758088955206 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150860146143 0.150359130593 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0505022534622 0.0667264976115 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 14.1392134831 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 48.8420337079 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 12.1639044944 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.03 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 100.480337079 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.