Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? When teachers assign projects on which student must work together, the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer
Education is a powerful tool for students to gain knowledge. There is no denying there are various factors that have an impact on this process. Some people believe diligent pupils who work individually can learn better, while others hold precisely the opposite perspective. I subscribe to the view that teamwork is more effective than working alone. I will elaborate on my viewpoints in the following paragraphs.
Firstly, one of the primary purposes of working together is sharing ideas and notions. Moreover, most of the students try to be creative among their friends to show off their abilities to them; consequently, they encounter enormous details and expertise, which leads them to learn better. For instance, for a high school project, our teacher divided us into groups to bring our data and understandings from a topic to the group members, which I found fascinating because my friends had a lot of information that let us get the highest grade in that class. Give and take is a part of our social life, and it unifies humans in different aspects. Pupils should not forget that the more we give, the more we gain.
Secondly, wherever groups are established, competition is rolling out among groups and within groups. Generally speaking, a project is constantly breaking into varied tasks that help the students be more organized and work hard for their segments to be finished on time and present more information than their teammates. A vivid example is my sister, who is strict about the quality of a job; last year, she was part of a team for a project that made her work on it for days and nights to prove them she has a high capability of being the best, and as a result, their team won the prize of the year. In other words, most of our success is held on how much we feel responsible; it also can bring more knowledge if group works could exploit it.
Lastly, most of the students need to focus on the content they are learning, so concentration is a crucial factor that should not be neglected. Team works would eliminate this possibility for them, and as a result, their efficiency in learning would decrease. According to a study, most pupils have better focus when they are on their own, which lets them gain more knowledge. Quiet environments can bring a higher concentration range to most students, which cannot be available by bustling group works.
Overall, several factors have a direct influence on learning that is not negligible. Most cases suggest that groups can provide a better environment for learning while some others are against it. This decision is held in teachers' hands, and they should see which one has more weight than the other.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Children should only play sports for fun not in competitions or contests 70
- Some people believe that when busy parents do not have a lot of time to spend with their children the best use of that time is to have fun playing games or sports Others believe that it is best to use that time doing things together that are related to sc 73
- TPO31 Sinosauropteryx s feather 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The extended family grandparent cousins aunts and uncles is less important now than it was in the past Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 90
- Some people believe that when busy parents do not have a lot of time to spend with their children the best use of that time is to have fun playing games or sports Others believe that it is best to use that time doing things together that are related to sc 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 213, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to better', 'to well'
Suggestion: to better; to well
... pupils who work individually can learn better, while others hold precisely the opposi...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 281, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to better', 'to well'
Suggestion: to better; to well
...nd expertise, which leads them to learn better. For instance, for a high school projec...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 163, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to while'
Suggestion: to while
...ovide a better environment for learning while some others are against it. This decisi...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, firstly, if, lastly, moreover, second, secondly, so, while, for instance, as a result, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 15.1003584229 166% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.0286738351 163% => OK
Pronoun: 52.0 43.0788530466 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 51.0 52.1666666667 98% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2218.0 1977.66487455 112% => OK
No of words: 459.0 407.700716846 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.83224400871 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.62863751936 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64668134339 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 246.0 212.727598566 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.535947712418 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 666.9 618.680645161 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.9599753773 48.9658058833 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.619047619 100.406767564 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8571428571 20.6045352989 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.09523809524 5.45110844103 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.215191580498 0.236089414692 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0619162254858 0.076458572812 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0445908653949 0.0737576698707 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12394456506 0.150856017488 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.017330858926 0.0645574589148 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 11.7677419355 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.73 10.9000537634 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.46 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 86.8835125448 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.