People in many countries are spending less time with their family. What are the reasons, and effects of this?
It is widely acknowledged that family where life begins and love never ends. Having a family which we have somewhere to go home, and have someone to love is an integral part of our life. However, in modern-day life, people swamp with work leading to insufficient time for family. In this essay, I will list some testimonials to prove this tendency and how does it affect badly to the quality of family.
Certain justifications can demonstrate the absence of family time. First and foremost, people are occupied with their jobs. It is obvious that adults divert time to work and finish intense workloads. Children concentrate on studying and apply themselves to study hard. Moreover, the lack of family time is attributable to conflicts and understandings among family members and then leads to the deterioration of family relations. What is more, there is a school of thought which is an alleged root that individuals now depend on technological devices and they allot time to be stuck behind cutting-edge technology inexorably. For instance, teenagers hardly make time for their family in light of spending time surfing webs or playing games nowadays. The more time is spent, the more people are addicted to using these advanced tools.
These increasing trends can render bad implications. First of all, the family bond is broken. For example, marital discords do family tie a disservice. In fact, there is a host of married couples who get divorced every year, which is attributable to that they cannot feel compatible. Secondly, kids who do not get enough parental guidance and family love will experience the feeling of loneliness and isolation and then they become more vulnerable. Effectively, they engage in on-screen activities which fuel their feelings, let alone that it is to blame for next generations some repercussions such as violent or delinquent behaviors and so on.
To sum up, quality family time is imperative. Therefore, we should devote the amount of time to stay with family members and try to gain a work-life balance, so that we can strengthen the close family tie.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-04 | uyenmia | 78 | view |
| 2023-10-01 | tsln7607 | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-29 | Nguyễn Văn Việt | 92 | view |
| 2023-05-08 | remienn | 84 | view |
| 2022-11-20 | hanhkatori2402 | 78 | view |
- Some people say music is a good way of bringing people of different culture and ages together To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Explain some of the ways in which humans are damaging the environment What can government do to address these problems What can individual people do 89
- Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research business and the academic world Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely Discuss both views and give your 61
- People in many countries are spending less time with their family What are the reasons and effects of this 84
- Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, for example, for instance, in fact, such as, first of all, to sum up, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1749.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 345.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06956521739 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3097767484 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84633548776 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.594202898551 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 563.4 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 48.7702778339 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.45 106.682146367 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.25 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.8 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.268288974134 0.244688304435 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0780011428713 0.084324248473 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0570626088347 0.0667982634062 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155907814741 0.151304729494 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0760334302873 0.056905535591 134% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.0946893788 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.83 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.