The charts below show reasons for travel and the main issues for the travelling public in the US in 2009.
The charts illustrate the explanation as to why US residents travelled and the main problems which they experienced while travelling in 2009.
It is clear that the majority of Americans travelled to commute to and from work in 2009. Meanwhile, US people’s most common concern while travel public was the price of travelling.
As regards the reasons for travelling, 49% of those surveyed travelled for the purpose of commuting to and from work, while the figures for Americans’ trips for personal reasons or to go shopping were 19% and 16% respectively. Moreover, there are no significant differences in the rate of those who travelled for social or recreation rationale and to visit friend/relatives, at a mere 10% and 6%, corresponding.
Turning to the bar graph, in 2009, the price was the main issue that 36% of UK persons concerned. Nearly one out of five individuals cited safety concerns as their answers while the rate of American travellers agitating for aggressive drivers was 17%. In the same year, 14% of persons chose highway congestion to be the most important travel problem. Finally, the percentages of those survey answered access to public transport and space for pedestrians were around 7% each.
- Essay 6 Some people believe that everyone has a right to have access to university education and that governments should make it free for all students no matter what financial background they have To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- The line graph below shows changes in the amount of coffee exported from three countries between 2002 and 2012 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 87
- The line graph shows the percentage of New Zealand population from 1950 to 2050 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of young people in higher education in 2000 2005 and 2010
- The bar chart below shows data on top four coffee producing countries in the world from 2011 to 2013 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, if, moreover, so, while, as regards, as to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1028.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 199.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16582914573 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75589349951 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00818307706 2.65546596893 113% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 106.607317073 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.628140703518 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 305.1 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.0160465217 43.030603864 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.222222222 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1111111111 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.66666666667 5.23603664747 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.45189905618 0.215688989381 210% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.167128551944 0.103423049105 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0799401668645 0.0843802449381 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.267977867646 0.15604864568 172% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0404533706296 0.0819641961636 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.09 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 40.7170731707 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.