The graph below shows the proportion of population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries
The chart depicts detailed information on the 65+ demographics in three distinct nations over a century, starting from the year 1940.
Overall, it is evident that there is an overall growth in the number of senior citizens of three countries during the period. Another interesting point is that Japan is predicted to undergo a contrasting shift, becoming predominant among three categories in the future.
In 1940, nearly 10% of the US population was elderly, followed by Swedish with roughly 7%, both of these numbers then registered a constant rise to around 15% in orders, but soon fell modestly by 1% or 2%. While there was a period of stability in the figure for the former, the latter varied between 15% and 20%. From 2023, the figures are forecast to rise back to around 23% and 25% respectively in 2040.
Meanwhile, Japan was the country with the smallest ederly proportion. In 1940, the data stood at only 5%, and despite some negligible changes over the following years, this figure was always under 10%. It was not until 2020 that Japan is estimated to surge and reach 28% in 2040.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2024-06-17 | unstoppable | 73 | view |
2023-09-07 | Phuong1810 | 84 | view |
2023-09-07 | Phuong1810 | 67 | view |
2023-09-07 | Phuong1810 | 67 | view |
2023-07-24 | nguyenhnil | 67 | view |
- The chart below shows the results of a survey of people who visited four types of tourist attraction in Britain in the year 1999 78
- The graph below shows the proportion of population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries 78
- The chart below gives information about the growth of urban population in certain parts of the including the prediction of the future 89
- the diagram below show how ethanol fuel is produced from
- The chart shows the average monthly temperatures in three African cities 63
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 910.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 188.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84042553191 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70287850203 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55401139318 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 106.607317073 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.670212765957 0.547539520022 122% => OK
syllable_count: 265.5 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.728239609 43.030603864 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.111111111 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8888888889 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.66666666667 5.23603664747 51% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.181223769749 0.215688989381 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0656713086612 0.103423049105 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0368068604938 0.0843802449381 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10375492789 0.15604864568 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0338088802877 0.0819641961636 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.2329268293 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.91 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.