Two road tunnels in an Australia city

Essay topics:

Two road tunnels in an Australia city

The picture compares two underground tunnels constructed in a city in Australia.

It is noticeable that while Tunnel A goes under a river that has a bridge linking the two banks for vehicles, Tunnel B is an alternative for a road on the surface.

The construction of Tunnel A took place over a five-year period, from 1987 to 1992 and the budget for this was roughly 556 million dollars. This underground passage lengths 2.2 kilometers and lies 25 meters below the city surface, underneath the riverbed layer of stone and sand. This pathway consists of a double set of tubes, each of which allows two four-wheeled vehicles to travel side-by-side at the same time.

On the other hand, Tunnel B was built from 2004 and it took merely three years to finish. This development costs the city council twice the amount spent for Tunnel A, at approximately 1.1 billion dollars. Relatively, Tunnel B is 3.6 kilometers long and positioned 10 meters lower than Tunnel A. It is a second option for the surface road, accommodating 3 vehicles silmultaneously in each of the twin tube.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-06-29 maidiem.1508 73 view
2022-11-13 giangngoc 78 view
2021-11-22 Trang Duong 84 view
2021-03-21 Judie6203 89 view
2020-11-11 Lich Thi Thanh Tran 84 view
Essays by user Trang Duong :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 36, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'A go', 'A goe' or simply 'goes'?
Suggestion: A go; A goe; Goes
... It is noticeable that while Tunnel A goes under a river that has a bridge linking...
^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
second, while, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 897.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 184.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.875 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68302321012 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89260656356 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.625 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 264.6 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.6671296256 43.030603864 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.6666666667 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4444444444 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.55555555556 5.23603664747 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.357789476954 0.215688989381 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.138730906896 0.103423049105 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.121228278218 0.0843802449381 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.248493431017 0.15604864568 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.117847107055 0.0819641961636 144% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.2329268293 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.