Whether or not someone achieves their aims is mostly by a question of luck. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
There is a common belief that any success is greatly contributed by fortune. However, I completely oppose this viewpoint as accomplishment or failure are both generated by people themselves through their hard work and acknowledgment
On the one hand, it is undeniable that people determine their own lives by their own decisions. To be exact, there are some unfortunate individuals who are born with innate illnesses like limbs-loss or cardiovascular diseases still manage to have a decent life or even more flourish than normal people. For instance: Nick Vujik - an Australian speaker who is worldwide popular for his motivating story from the beginning of a child losing all 4 limbs to the greatest influencer who owns a company and has a happy family. As a result, some people do not happen to succeed as there is obviously no luck in their processes but totally by their own endeavors
On the other hand, it is knowledge and diligence that play a key role in people’s accomplishments. Specifically, by accumulating more knowledge and soft skills, people are able to handle more issues, make more sensible decisions and hence reach their goals faster. For example, luck can not bring people a diploma which is significant for a company’s applicant, nonetheless, it can be taken by studying and practice. Consequently, without a firm attempt and an open mind, a person is less likely to his or her target
To conclude, although luck is believed to have substantial impacts on people’s accomplishments, I still strongly disagree with it since luck can not stay with any individual permanently but only their abilities that can assure their future
- The charts show the percentage of people working in different sectors in town A and B in two years 1960 and 2010 84
- The table below shows the primary funding sources of international students in the US during the years 2003 04 and 2013 14 Write a 150 word report for a university lecturer describing the data and make comparisons where relevant 55
- The pictures describe an island named Paradise island in the past and in the present 89
- The line graph below shows the household recycling rates in three different countries Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- In the future it seems more difficult to live on Earth Some people think more money should be spent researching other planets such as Mars To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, hence, however, if, nonetheless, so, still, for example, for instance, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1395.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 271.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14760147601 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0951057155 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.630996309963 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 436.5 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 16.0721442886 50% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 33.0 20.2975951904 163% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 74.008445464 49.4020404114 150% => OK
Chars per sentence: 174.375 106.682146367 163% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.875 20.7667163134 163% => OK
Discourse Markers: 15.0 7.06120827912 212% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.109637944718 0.244688304435 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0438699309747 0.084324248473 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0447832448128 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0677342397157 0.151304729494 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0404657260698 0.056905535591 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.8 13.0946893788 151% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.98 50.2224549098 76% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 11.3001002004 143% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.18 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.05 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.2 10.1190380762 150% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.