The line graph below shows the household recycling rates in three different countries.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph compares the recycling index of households in 3 nations namely the UK, France, and Germany from 2005 to 2015
Overall, recycling was mostly favored by the residents living in the UK. Also, while the household recycling rates in the UK and Germany saw many growths, the figures from France followed an inverse trend
IN 2005, about half of the French population took part in recycling activities at home, while the figures from UK and Germany were relatively lower at around 35% and 20%, respectively. In the next 4 years, household recycling rates in the UK overtook the first-ranked position of France with 40% after hitting a plateau
After colliding with France, both the UK and Germany’s index of household recycling rose significantly to reach their peaks at approximately 60%. In sharp contrast, France witnessed a plummet in its figure to only land at 30% in 2013. However, this portion steadily increased by 10% when coming to the final year
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-04 | Parth panchal0908 | 73 | view |
| 2023-03-15 | thanhtu000 | 56 | view |
| 2023-03-15 | thanhtu000 | 80 | view |
| 2023-03-11 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2023-02-19 | Giang Tran | 78 | view |
- Today food travels thousands of miles before it reaches customers Why is this so Is this a positive or negative trend 89
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- In many parts of the world children and teenagers are committing more crimes Why is this happening How should they be punished 67
- The table below shows the production of cocoa beans in six regions between 1992 and 1998 tonnes 67
- The map below shows the development of the village of Ryemouth between 1995 and present Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 810.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 162.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56762134501 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72574028711 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.623456790123 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 243.0 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 22.4926829268 142% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 97.950191424 43.030603864 228% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 162.0 112.824112599 144% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.4 22.9334400587 141% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.23603664747 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.114549487334 0.215688989381 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0568644523787 0.103423049105 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0502019417512 0.0843802449381 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0844371251621 0.15604864568 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.036617994579 0.0819641961636 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.3 13.2329268293 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.46 61.2550243902 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.3012195122 142% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.02 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.9970731707 135% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.