It is more important to keep your old friends
Some people may argue that making new friends is more important. But in my opinion, keeping old friends is more important. I think in this way because of three reasons.
First of all, old friends understand us better. They know about our past, so they can understand what is the motive of a seemingly weird behaviour of us. On the other hand, new friends may care for us, but they would feel lost when we are behaving in a way that is not usual to them. It takes time to understand a person. To understand a new friend, in most cases, you would have to be an old friend before you start to understand the friend properly. Otherwise it would be hard for someone to spend all of his time with new friends. When he feels down, he would have nowhere to go.
Second of all, one is comfortable around a person who knows one's past. If someone has financial problem, it would be inconsiderate to offer him to go to a fancy resturant. But someone has to spend a lot of time with another person to know whether this person has financial and persronal problems or not. For this reason, we are comfortable around people who know our past, family background, and financial difficulties, etc. Without these persons around, we may start to feel uncomfortable when offered to go somewhere, do something or meet someone.
The third reason I give more importance on keeping old friends is we may feel pathetic when we keep loosing old friends. If someone suddenly realises that he doesn't have contact with his high school best friend begining from the college, he might feel the friend was with him because one of them needed another. It may feel like it was a need based friendship, not love based. It may lead someone to overthinking and feel bad about oneself. This also may lead to stress and depression. So keeping old friends is more important for mental health too.
It is undeniable that making new friends in new environments is also important, but not with the expense of old friends. With all the above discussions, it is clear that we have to give more importance on keeping old friends rather than making new ones.
- Rembrandt was a famous artist 73
- An international development organization in response to a vitamin A deficiency among people in the impoverished nation of Tagus has engineered a new breed of millet high in vitamin A While seeds for this new type of millet cost more farmers will be paid 50
- Manager s memorundum 55
- To understand the most important characteristics of a society one must study its major cities Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In develo 66
- It is more important to keep your old friends 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 453, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Otherwise,
...tart to understand the friend properly. Otherwise it would be hard for someone to spend a...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 61, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...s comfortable around a person who knows ones past. If someone has financial problem,...
^^^^
Line 7, column 159, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...s. If someone suddenly realises that he doesnt have contact with his high school best ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, second, so, third, as to, i think, first of all, in most cases, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 48.0 43.0788530466 111% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 52.1666666667 104% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1743.0 1977.66487455 88% => OK
No of words: 379.0 407.700716846 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.59894459103 4.8611393121 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41224685777 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54434565978 2.67179642975 95% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 212.727598566 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.480211081794 0.524837075471 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 521.1 618.680645161 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.3444389606 48.9658058833 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 75.7826086957 100.406767564 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.4782608696 20.6045352989 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.34782608696 5.45110844103 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.311647724319 0.236089414692 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10896675844 0.076458572812 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.161259326491 0.0737576698707 219% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.216503779264 0.150856017488 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.132206860868 0.0645574589148 205% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.5 11.7677419355 72% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 58.1214874552 124% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.1575268817 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.1 10.9000537634 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.85 8.01818996416 85% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 86.8835125448 67% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.0 10.002688172 50% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.