In many countries schools have severe problems with student behavior.
What do you think are the causes of this?
What solutions can you suggest?
In many countries schools have severe problems with student behavior. What do you think are the causes of this? What solutions can you suggest?
Schools have the authorities to set their own rules to students. These rules are demonstrated in their legal document called student engagement policy. Nonetheless, these rules now are challenged by many students due to several misbehaviors resulting a serious problem for school to face. In thiss essay, I will examine reasons on this appealing occurance and provide the best solutions to overcome that.
Students’ misbehaviors are contributed deliberately both by psychological and environmental factors. Withdarwn behaviour can affect badly to studying process. Meanwhile, the conducive atmosphere of a class is highly needed to encourage students’ attentive attitudes. Withdrawn behaviors can be varied to several actions such as truancy, anxiety, calling out in class and a sudden tantrum. On the other hand, a noisy classroom and a poor seat arrangement can cause students’ challenging behaviors. For instance, refusing to follow instructions, misconsetration in which lead to apathy. As a result, these events will totally reduce the effectiveness of the learning process and will be very challenging for teachers to deliver lessons.
Since none of these causes were placing others in harm, seclusion and creating a good condition for learning are the best ways to curb with this deviation. Seclusion is meant to solve misbehaviors which come from inside. Furthermore, for an external influence, rebuilding convinient surronding is essential in prompting learners to study. Students possessed unusual behavior need to be kept in temporary isolation while teachers talk to them privately to discuss any causes of their misbehaviors and find the most suitable methods to adjust with them. However, if a class is too noisy for learning process or the arrangement of seats poorly placing lazy students altogether, it would require an upright re-arrangement, moving the class to other areas and balancing the seat line among different type of students. In many countries, these methods have resulted to an efficinent enforcement for both psychology and environment causes to students’ challenging behaviors.
In conclusion, psychology and environment play significant roles in favor of students’ misbehaviors, therefore, seclusion and managing the best atmosphere for learning are spot on.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2023-10-10 | huynguyen37 | 73 | view |
2023-08-13 | quynhanhvu | 67 | view |
2023-06-16 | dorae | 56 | view |
2023-04-19 | TinaLam | 61 | view |
2023-04-19 | TinaLam | 73 | view |
- Group or team activities can teach more skills for life than those activities which are played alone Do you agree or disagree 78
- Group eam activities can teach more skills for life than those activities which are played alone Do you agree or disagree 78
- In the world of internet people write on internet about a product s reviews and opinions about a service Is it a good thing or bad thing 61
- Nowadays many people have access to computers on a wide basis and a large number of children play computer games What are the negative impacts of children playing computer games and what can be done to minimize the bad effects 78
- International tourism has brought about enormous benefits to many places At the same time there is concern about its impact on local inhabitants and the environment Do the disadvantages of international tourism outweigh the advantages 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, nonetheless, so, therefore, while, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2093.0 1615.20841683 130% => OK
No of words: 368.0 315.596192385 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.6875 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37987740619 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16009943484 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584239130435 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 634.5 506.74238477 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 55.6000456777 49.4020404114 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.6666666667 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5238095238 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.38095238095 7.06120827912 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.342349229634 0.244688304435 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118121552204 0.084324248473 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.167148314416 0.0667982634062 250% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.27791201153 0.151304729494 184% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.363408999295 0.056905535591 639% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.43 12.4159519038 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.84 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 125.0 78.4519038076 159% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.