Improvements in health, education and trade are essential for the development of poorer nations. However, the governments of richer nations should take more responsibility for helping the poorer nations in such areas.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
The need to improve facilities in health, education and trade is crucial for poorer countries development. Nevertheless, the development of world is all countries responsibility, therefore, richer countries should also take parts for helping the poorer nations in several aspects. In this essay, I will give my reason on why I believe that richer countries should help the poorer one.
I personally agree that economy, education and health are the most substansial aspects in a country, therefore, advanced countries which normally dominate in those several key areas should help those underdeveloped regions to out from poverty. Countries like United States of America and China, for instance, are superpower in stock market. On the other hand, Indonesia, one of the poorest countries in the world, has long had a problem with undeveloped national income. A loan or mutual relation between the richer and poorer would absolutely be helpful to a better future for this southeast asian country.
I also firmly believe that underdeveloped countries cannot survive or improve their productivity by themselves. For example, in order to generate golden generation in a country, government should invest the best education to their young generation. One way to do that is by sending them to the best schools in the world. Underdeloped countries tend to have lower quality in their education, meanwhile, studying abroad is relatively expensive. Therefore, a scholarship from richer countries is highly needed to help these teenagers to afford good education overseas. The higher education, the better the young generation can participate to develope their countries.
In conclusion, domination of advanced countries in many key areas should make them be responsible to help poorer nations to develop.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-18 | nijam | 84 | view |
| 2023-04-06 | Desi Sari Ayuni | 73 | view |
| 2023-03-02 | InamAli | 73 | view |
| 2023-01-26 | Guiseppe59192 | 70 | view |
| 2022-06-29 | Guri473812 | 61 | view |
- School should teach students sex education comprehensively do you agree or disagree 73
- The tendency of human beings to copy one another is shown in thepopularity of fashion clothes and consume goods Do you agree or disagree 11
- The prevention of health problems and health illness is more important than treatment and medicine Government funding should reflect this To what extent do you agree 67
- Some people believe that the radio is more enjoyable and practical than TV What is your opinion 61
- Some people think that due to improvements in technology traditional skills of writing letters will disappear do you agree or disagree 61
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 85, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'countries'' or 'country's'?
Suggestion: countries'; country's
...ucation and trade is crucial for poorer countries development. Nevertheless, the developm...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 154, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'countries'' or 'country's'?
Suggestion: countries'; country's
...heless, the development of world is all countries responsibility, therefore, richer count...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 666, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...articipate to develope their countries. In conclusion, domination of advanced co...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, nevertheless, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1520.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 277.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.48736462094 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01675476994 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.56678700361 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 478.8 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.6727043367 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.571428571 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7857142857 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.21428571429 7.06120827912 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.315381065976 0.244688304435 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108910108393 0.084324248473 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0886292913796 0.0667982634062 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.221361047275 0.151304729494 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0877365489747 0.056905535591 154% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.56 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.08 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 85, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'countries'' or 'country's'?
Suggestion: countries'; country's
...ucation and trade is crucial for poorer countries development. Nevertheless, the developm...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 154, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'countries'' or 'country's'?
Suggestion: countries'; country's
...heless, the development of world is all countries responsibility, therefore, richer count...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 666, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...articipate to develope their countries. In conclusion, domination of advanced co...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, nevertheless, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1520.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 277.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.48736462094 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01675476994 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.56678700361 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 478.8 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.6727043367 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.571428571 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7857142857 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.21428571429 7.06120827912 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.315381065976 0.244688304435 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108910108393 0.084324248473 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0886292913796 0.0667982634062 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.221361047275 0.151304729494 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0877365489747 0.056905535591 154% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.56 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.08 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.