Globalization is creating a world of one culture and destroying national identity.
To what extent do you agree with this statement?
Globalization is taking place all over the world. It has been considered to be a result of the unification in the future, however, is also a sign of the disappearance of national identity. From my point of view, I can feel that globalization is not as beneficial as some people think, especially when it comes to culture. Therefore, I agree with this given topic.
Firstly, globalization often comes from developed countries, for instance, the United States, England or Australia,...These days it is not difficult to find investment or cooperation between the developed and developing countries. Some people find that contracts are just the outers for their main purpose of globalization through cultures, which means poor regions are going to be assimilated soon. For instance, the high-quality products with reasonable prices of some well-known brands will be sold in the markets, step by step will result in the favoritism of international instead of the national ones. Consequently, the biases are said to would destroy the cultural identity due to the fact that citizens nowadays are no longer interested in their national products or culture, which are said to be low-quality or old-fashioned.
Besides, there have been several solutions given to deal with this problem. What is difficult is to change the attitudes and prejudices of some people’s thoughts toward their traditions. However, it is possible that factories can manufacture products with the best quality and satisfy users so they do not have to buy foreign’s ones. Moreover, children in elementary or kindergarten should be taught to cherish their own national identities and places they are living so that they can raise their awareness.
In conclusion, globalization is not an ideal solution to perform while it brings back the biggest drawbacks, losing national identities. Hence, government and citizens should raise their own awareness supporting their nations to prevent being assimilated.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-03-05 | Jason Lee | 73 | view |
| 2022-01-08 | Ahmad Gelora Mahardika | 56 | view |
| 2021-12-17 | _phdiep | 42 | view |
| 2021-10-10 | khushboo choudhary | 73 | view |
| 2021-10-07 | viviene | 70 | view |
- The position of women has changed a great deal in many societies over the past 50 years But these societies cannot claim to have achieved gender equality To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Students are becoming more and more reliant on the Internet While the Internet is convenient it has many negative effects and its use for educational purposes should be restricted How far do you agree with this statement 73
- The position of women has changed a great deal in many societies over the past 50 years But these societies cannot claim to have achieved gender equality To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Tourism has increased so much over the last 50 years that it is having a mainly negative impact on local inhabitants and the environment However others claim that it is good for the economy Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of tourism and give your 84
- The tables below show people s reasons for giving up smoking and when they intend to give up summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisions where relevant 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 115, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , .
... the United States, England or Australia,...These days it is not difficult to find...
^^
Line 3, column 119, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: These
... United States, England or Australia,...These days it is not difficult to find invest...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, consequently, first, firstly, hence, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, well, while, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 13.1623246493 167% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1673.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 308.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.43181818182 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14942930682 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577922077922 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 514.8 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.0573020242 49.4020404114 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.5 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.28571428571 7.06120827912 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190856589805 0.244688304435 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0666771793698 0.084324248473 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0438374072827 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111239973013 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0328937432952 0.056905535591 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.21 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.14 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.