Many people argue that in order to improve educational quality, high school students are encouraged to make comments or even criticism of their teachers. Others think it will lead to loss of respect and discipline in the classroom. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Accordingly, critical sentiments given to educationalists are believed to accompany disrespect and could potentially break the formal doctrine, otherwise, it is essential to some people for the justification of educational betterment. I contend that in order to drive the existing conventional teaching methods to improve quality, criticism is important, given the right contexts.
For one, the view of criticizing contradicts moral and ethical behavior could be explained by several reasons, leading to the loss of formal classroom doctrine as well as respect for educators. Being allowed to confess their thinking to the tutor with a certain degree of respect, adolescents at rebellious phase often pose flexibility and sometimes give trenchant comments with their out-of-control emotions before consciousness. Occasionally, when tension reaches a certain degree, it will turn into arguments in which the professionalism of a tutor is negatively affected and students behave unethically. Both of which would impact severely on the overall discipline and lesson quality.
For another, I hold the view that students should have a right to give suggestions for adjustments in academic environments under the governance of regulations to ensure the teaching quality. Apparently, students could trigger the misunderstanding or errors in the tutor's performance as to both correcting and in turn, sharpening their critical thinking. Additionally, it is a more reasonable educational approach in which the learners are able to express their ideas autonomously, which will entail a dynamic learning environment when the process of exchanging thoughts is facilitated by the willingness of teachers to perceive comments and students’ respectful attitudes toward them. As a result, it will structure a solid and liberal education system, promoting further abstractions.
To conclude, the concept of criticism depends upon personal perspectives toward it. Profoundly, the implications could bring dire consequences if actions are not taken under the consciousness of morality. Instead, it should be better used for improvement in any circumstances.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-12 | minh phương phạm hồng | 73 | view |
| 2023-02-05 | tieuquynh | 89 | view |
| 2022-12-19 | Lunar Tran | 67 | view |
| 2022-12-18 | Lunar Tran | 61 | view |
| 2022-09-12 | Charles Le | 84 | view |
- Many companies invest their money in sports games for advertisement purposes Some people think it is good for the sports world while others believe that it has some disadvantages Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
- Parents should take courses in parenting in order to improve the lives of their children To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Nowadays many people cannot read or write What problems does this cause What measures can governments take to solve these problems 84
- Some people think the main purpose of school is to turn children into good citizens and workers rather than to benefit them as individuals To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Some claim that men are naturally more competitive than women To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 266, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'tutors'' or 'tutor's'?
Suggestion: tutors'; tutor's
...r the misunderstanding or errors in the tutors performance as to both correcting and i...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, apparently, if, so, well, as to, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1839.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 312.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.89423076923 5.12529762239 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20279927342 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.41185709253 2.80592935109 122% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.628205128205 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 567.0 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 72.5963958223 49.4020404114 147% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.461538462 106.682146367 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.30769230769 7.06120827912 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.234477076037 0.244688304435 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.068270132543 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0371355240143 0.0667982634062 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119937514495 0.151304729494 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0566933934316 0.056905535591 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.3 13.0946893788 140% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 50.2224549098 60% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.18 12.4159519038 138% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.95 8.58950901804 127% => OK
difficult_words: 121.0 78.4519038076 154% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.