The graph below shows different sources of air pollutants in the UK from 1990 to 2005. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph illustrates different factors causing air polution in British from 1990 to 2005
In general, the total air polutants underwent the significant decline during the period shown. It was immuatably true that the number of air polutant from the households was the lowest.
In 1990, there was the similar in the number of air polutants released by vehicles and households with nearly 1 tonne. Meanwhile, the data of industry in that year was greatly higher than two remaining source with 5.5 tonnes and the total air pollutants stood at 7 tonnes. After 6 years, the figure of industry saw a dramatic decrease 2.5 tonnes to 3 tonnes. There was the similar fluctuation in the total of air pollutant which sharply fell to 4 tonnes. Whereas, the household pollutants were slightly dropped from nearly 1 tonne to 0.5 tonnes in 1996. In contrast, transport pollutants were slowly rose to 1 tonne in 6 years.
In the last year of the period shown, the number of air pollutant released by domestic continued being the lowest which decreased to nearly 0 tonne. The vehicle waste went down slightly before standing at 1 tonne in 2005, while, the data of industry maintained the decline from 3 tonnes to 2 tonnes. The total atmospheric pollutants generally dropped to 3.1 tonnes in the end of period.
- The chart below shows the percentage of the population in the UK who consumed the recommended daily amount of fruit and vegetables in 2002 2006 and 2010 67
- The diagram below shows how ethanol fuel is produced from corn
- The process shows how waste glass bottles are recycled Write a report of at least 150 words describing the main details 78
- The diagram shows the plan of medical center in 2008 and 2010 73
- The education of young people is highly prioritized in many countries However educating adults who cannot write or read is even more important and governments should spend more money on this To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 203, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'source' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'sources'.
Suggestion: sources
...r was greatly higher than two remaining source with 5.5 tonnes and the total air pollu...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 456, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...llutant which sharply fell to 4 tonnes. Whereas, the household pollutants were slightly...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 601, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'risen'.
Suggestion: risen
...trast, transport pollutants were slowly rose to 1 tonne in 6 years. In the last ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 143, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'tonne' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'tonnes'.
Suggestion: tonnes
... the lowest which decreased to nearly 0 tonne. The vehicle waste went down slightly b...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, whereas, while, in contrast, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1086.0 965.302439024 113% => OK
No of words: 222.0 196.424390244 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89189189189 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8600083453 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62709561324 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.513513513514 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 314.1 283.868780488 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.33902439024 207% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.2653216409 43.030603864 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.7272727273 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1818181818 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.27272727273 5.23603664747 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.156456068341 0.215688989381 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0664426744565 0.103423049105 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0417452471185 0.0843802449381 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124503084304 0.15604864568 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0667876735696 0.0819641961636 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 203, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'source' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'sources'.
Suggestion: sources
...r was greatly higher than two remaining source with 5.5 tonnes and the total air pollu...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 456, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...llutant which sharply fell to 4 tonnes. Whereas, the household pollutants were slightly...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 601, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'risen'.
Suggestion: risen
...trast, transport pollutants were slowly rose to 1 tonne in 6 years. In the last ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 143, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'tonne' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'tonnes'.
Suggestion: tonnes
... the lowest which decreased to nearly 0 tonne. The vehicle waste went down slightly b...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, whereas, while, in contrast, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1086.0 965.302439024 113% => OK
No of words: 222.0 196.424390244 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89189189189 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8600083453 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62709561324 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.513513513514 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 314.1 283.868780488 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.33902439024 207% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.2653216409 43.030603864 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.7272727273 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1818181818 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.27272727273 5.23603664747 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.156456068341 0.215688989381 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0664426744565 0.103423049105 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0417452471185 0.0843802449381 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124503084304 0.15604864568 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0667876735696 0.0819641961636 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.