Some people think that being able to communicate with others online is breaking down geographical barriers and enabling people, who would normally never have the chance to meet, to communicate.
What are the advantages of international communication online? Are there any disadvantages to this?
Some people imagine that being competent to taking with others online is geographical for tification and authorize people, who would average never have the fate meet, to inform. This essay will examine both sides of the argument before a reasoned conclusion is drawn.
Admittedly, there are some argument in favor of international communicate online. First, called online or communicate online believed that people can talk to each other wherever they are. This communicate online support, presumably helps everyone convey important information but also everyone can communicate with many people. This can help them in work that requires agility and good communicate. Second, communicate on the internet helps shy people, humble, alone and disabled easy express them selves. In fact, it is acknowledged that is the most modern technology in many last years. Foster more people-to-person conversations.
Nevertheless, the resultant problems would be far more significant than the minor benefits once called online. First, communicate online often make the poor about words causes degradation of understood form of languages. Second, Labor Day is the habit, attracts everyone to the internet, communicate place appears as interesting, gives the meaning of existence. Thus, the internet occupies the full attention of the personal and influences the personality of a person in the information of consciousness. It,instead l, it would be a more viable option it people could talk to each others outside of society because of virtual communication.
I was discuss about advantages and disadvantages of international communicate online. This above essay show off have many disadvantages than advantages.
- Some people believe that sport has an important role in society Others however feel that it is nothing more than a leisure activity for some people Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 84
- The diagram below shows how a modern landfill for household waste is designed Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- The graph show the price of bananas in 4 different countries from 1996 to 2004 74
- Some countries allow old people to work to any age that they want Some countries alluring old people to vocations to whatever age that they want This essay will examine both sides of argument before a reasoned conclusion is drawn 56
- The chart below gives information about different types of in one country in 1960 and 2011 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 493, Rule ID: THEM_SELVES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'themselves'?
Suggestion: themselves
...humble, alone and disabled easy express them selves. In fact, it is acknowledged that is th...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 507, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , instead
... in the information of consciousness. It,instead l, it would be a more viable option it ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 555, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'peoples'?
Suggestion: peoples
... l, it would be a more viable option it people could talk to each others outside of so...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 7, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'discussed'.
Suggestion: discussed
...ecause of virtual communication. I was discuss about advantages and disadvantages of i...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, nevertheless, second, so, thus, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1446.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 255.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.67058823529 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12625522657 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.623529411765 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 474.3 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.7517939338 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.375 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.9375 20.7667163134 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.8125 7.06120827912 54% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.358216262579 0.244688304435 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103768085222 0.084324248473 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0957314131955 0.0667982634062 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.200918708268 0.151304729494 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0607129836561 0.056905535591 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.87 50.2224549098 61% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.31 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.15 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.