The influence of human beings on the world's ecosystem is leading to the extinction of species and loss of biodiversity.
What are the primary causes of the loss of biodiversity? What solutions can you suggest?
The extinction of flora and fauna and the imbalanced ecology, being as the hotly debated topics worldwide, are attributed mainly to many adverse impacts of global citizens’ basic activities. This essay would indicate the root causes that have greatly contributed to this problem and then propose certain measures to radically address it.
In terms of the running reasons for the devastation of species and biodiversity, human overexploitation is perhaps the decisive factor. This is mainly derived from the fact that the populating explosion boosts more demands for materials from nature - the prerequisite of the manufacturing sector. Besides that, the overpopulation also correlates with an upsurge in demand for accommodation and other related amenities, as the area of hospitable land on Earth is restrictive; to be more precise, the globe comprises one-fourth of the land surface while the remaining are oceans, which explains why a starling amount of land is required for inhabitants. For instance, in some regions, forests are being cut down to make room for residential areas and recreational facilities, resulting in the loss of natural habitats for native flora and fauna.
Regarding feasible solutions to properly tackle this intense issue, it is indispensable for the governor to put a strict legislation system for conserving living creatures and biodiversity into practice immediately. For the world at large, should the use of species for industry be restricted to a moderating level, the faunas and floras will not be on the verge of extinction. Furthermore, to remedy the severity of this problem, the state leader should channel their expenditure and endeavour into upgrading housing infrastructures to satisfy the needs of their citizens. More attempts and budgets should be prudent for erecting accommodations that can make the best use of land.
In conclusion, as for the aforementioned explanations, the extinction of species and loss of biodiversity result from overconsumption and the destruction of species’ habitats; however, this dilemma can be resolved by adopting strict regulations and building complex residential areas.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-25 | hau | 11 | view |
| 2022-08-22 | jenifer Le | 89 | view |
| 2022-07-28 | Nhi Lý | 89 | view |
| 2022-07-28 | Nhi Lý | 89 | view |
| 2022-03-10 | lennie.butera | 89 | view |
- Some people think that technology is increasing the gap between the rich and the poor Others think the opposite Discuss both views and give your own opinion 84
- Studying with a group of students in a classroom is more beneficial than learning online at home To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- It is suggested that primary children should learn how to grow vegetables and keep animals Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 78
- It is a natural process for animal species to become extinct e g dinosaur dodo There is no reason why people should try to prevent this from happening To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- It is suggested that primary children should learn how to grow vegetables and keep animals Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 682, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ons that can make the best use of land. In conclusion, as for the aforementioned...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, furthermore, however, regarding, so, then, while, as for, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1832.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 328.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.58536585366 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25567506705 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.22396560648 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.615853658537 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 580.5 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 20.2975951904 143% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 67.495576837 49.4020404114 137% => OK
Chars per sentence: 166.545454545 106.682146367 156% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.8181818182 20.7667163134 144% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.54545454545 7.06120827912 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.142822637423 0.244688304435 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0565162704088 0.084324248473 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0545863666159 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10043202497 0.151304729494 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0629572558701 0.056905535591 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.8 13.0946893788 151% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 25.12 50.2224549098 50% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.0 11.3001002004 150% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.73 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.28 8.58950901804 131% => OK
difficult_words: 129.0 78.4519038076 164% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.1190380762 134% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.