Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
There are different opinions towards what students should study at university. It is generally believed that students can choose to study their favourite subjects. However, it is sometimes argued that students should study fields that these people think will be valuable in the future such as science and technology. This essay will discuss both views before reaching the conclusion that students are able to choose their area of study.
On the one hand, some people claimed that restricting university students to subjects like science and technology should be carried out because of these areas’ contribution to society. Particularly, the development in science or technology leads to an increase in the levels of life quality that includes a large number of fields. For example, the invention of the vaccine Covid-19 thanks to advances in medical research, computer science and technology helped to create herd immunity and reduced the number of patients. It seems that studying these kinds of subjects is a better choice when students go to university.
On the other hand, I believe that students can choose to study whatever they like. This is because a country not only needs developments in science or technology but also other areas such as economics, arts and so on to become prosperous. Take economics as an example, students in this area can also contribute to society by putting forward a great many ideas to improve the economic situation, especially in the Covid-19 pandemic, when economics is affected seriously. In contrast, students who are proficient in science and technology could not bring out a proper solution to alleviate the economic problems. Clearly, all subjects are important and have different values, so students should be allowed to study their desire.
In conclusion, although restricting students to study subjects that may be useful in the future like science and technology would make a great contribution to society, I strongly believe that allowing students to choose what they love to study will help to develop the country comprehensively.
- At the present time the population of some countries includes a relatively large number of young adults compared with the number of older people Do the advantages of this situation outweigh the disadvantages 73
- The chart below shows the value of one country s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016 The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main 78
- In a number of countries some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport Discuss both these v 73
- Human activities have negative effects on plant and animal species Some people think it is too late to do anything about this problem Others believe that effective measures can be taken to improve this situation Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
- The plans below show the layout of a university s sports centre now and how it will look after redevelopment 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 307, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...he levels of life quality that includes a large number of fields. For example, the invention of t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, as to, for example, in conclusion, in contrast, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1765.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 331.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33232628399 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26537283232 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82247673085 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.513595166163 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 552.6 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.0952620774 49.4020404114 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.071428571 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6428571429 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.64285714286 7.06120827912 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.488851239341 0.244688304435 200% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.168748054497 0.084324248473 200% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.116417567925 0.0667982634062 174% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.301854645424 0.151304729494 200% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0471802127321 0.056905535591 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.93 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.