Those who see their ideas through, regardless of doubts or criticism others may express, are the ones who tend to leave a lasting legacy.
Many would assert that those who see their ideas through, regardless of doubts or criticism others may express, are the ones who tend to leave a lasting legacy because those people predict future with great insights which the contemporary people are not able to understand. Yet, I still believe that if people become provisional toward their belief and ignore all other concerns, this can be deleterious to themselves and societies. I am going to bolster my arguments with delineated explanation.
Of course, the history reflects many incidents that turned out to be ture when one incisive person saw one amazing idea and was neglected by most contemporary people. For example, the reknowned CEO of Apple Inc. - Steve Jobs - saw the future precisely than any one else, and back that time, almost every people did not care about his thought. Even, some people degrade Jobs's ideas. However, as time passed, modern society lives almost exactly same as he predicted. This is what we call a lasting legacy. Having a sharp idea, whether people impugn or not, is important to those who want to leave a great remark on history.
Notwithstanding the fact that many incidents reflect a lasting legacy with pundit's expectation of future, arguing ideas, regardless of doubuts or criticism others, all the time can be dangerous. Historical remarks happens in extremely rare. Almost those who see thier ideas and ignore others tend to be impluasible and pedantic. In recent days, there is one group, still, maintain that the Earth is flat and not in spherical. Besiding their content, we all know that the Earth is not flat at all. They just continue to argue their ideas, but they do not even try to understand or accept the proven fact. Like this case, most of cases imply people's demanor is extremely dogmatic; remarking on history with great leacy will be miniscule occasion througoht the time.
In addition, although if one's idea turned out to be a great legacy, we should not become negelct to others people who have meticulous travail to prove the one's idea. For instance, assuming one intimtiable scientist predicted the future that people are going to transport everywhere within one second, and the science field criticized his idea harshly. However, the scientist did not change his opinion. Then, after 100 years, the idea became reliable and people do really transport easily. The contemporary people would remember the scientist well; but people would never realize other scientists' efforts to make the idea to shape into reality. So, strictly speaking, one's legacy is rooted from many refutation and many criticism, and it is not only from one's belief seoly.
To sum up, despite we see many great insights which was predicted in the past by people, most cases we experience in daily lives will be not legit. Also, even with the ideas turned out to be a lasting legacy, it came from many others' reseraches - not merely from one's great idea.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-04-06 | rahatumar9072 | 83 | view |
| 2023-08-24 | Ruhani | 66 | view |
| 2023-07-18 | jayauen | 50 | view |
| 2023-06-23 | the.umair__ | 75 | view |
| 2023-04-16 | keisham | 70 | view |
- The following is a petition to the city council of Centerville Over the past three years there has been a marked increase in cases of sidewalk rage similar to the irrational anger drivers experience on the road but instead among sidewalk walkers The resul 70
- Understanding the past is of little use to those in current positions of leadership 66
- Discussing controversial topics with those with contrasting views is not useful because very few people change their mind when questioned about their core beliefs 66
- The following appeared as part of the Dean s newsletter The University of Wabash is considering a community service requirement for all undergraduate and graduate students We believe that the objective of any university is to produce well rounded and char 59
- Government officials should rely on their own judgment rather than unquestioningly carry out the will of the people whom they serve 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 258, Rule ID: ANY_BODY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'anyone'?
Suggestion: anyone
...ve Jobs - saw the future precisely than any one else, and back that time, almost every ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 621, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the cases') or simply say ''most cases''.
Suggestion: most of the cases; most cases
...accept the proven fact. Like this case, most of cases imply peoples demanor is extremely dogm...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 26, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...t the time. In addition, although if ones idea turned out to be a great legacy, w...
^^^^
Line 7, column 669, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...pe into reality. So, strictly speaking, ones legacy is rooted from many refutation a...
^^^^
Line 7, column 696, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun refutation seems to be countable; consider using: 'many refutations'.
Suggestion: many refutations
...ly speaking, ones legacy is rooted from many refutation and many criticism, and it is not only ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 716, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun criticism seems to be countable; consider using: 'many criticisms'.
Suggestion: many criticisms
...gacy is rooted from many refutation and many criticism, and it is not only from ones belief se...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 756, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...many criticism, and it is not only from ones belief seoly. To sum up, despite we ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, really, second, so, still, then, well, for example, for instance, in addition, of course, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.3162921348 141% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 33.0505617978 109% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 58.6224719101 97% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2458.0 2235.4752809 110% => OK
No of words: 492.0 442.535393258 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99593495935 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.70967865282 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49799919936 2.79657885939 89% => OK
Unique words: 264.0 215.323595506 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.536585365854 0.4932671777 109% => OK
syllable_count: 774.0 704.065955056 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.77640449438 281% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.2370786517 124% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 57.286731448 60.3974514979 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.32 118.986275619 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.68 23.4991977007 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.12 5.21951772744 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 7.80617977528 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 5.13820224719 175% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.349204916182 0.243740707755 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0849640244327 0.0831039109588 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.131216643491 0.0758088955206 173% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.210501012623 0.150359130593 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.129065238954 0.0667264976115 193% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 14.1392134831 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.8420337079 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 12.1639044944 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 124.0 100.480337079 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 79.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.