some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. Others believe that some infomation is too important or too valueable to be shared freely.Discuss both these views and give your opinion?
Whether or not information should be revealed as much as possible in the academic world is a hotly-debated topic that often divides opinion. Many people claim that it is the right thing to do while others believe that a lot of information is so precious or crucial that it should not be shared for free. In my opinion, I lean towards the idea that some vital information should not be widely shared.
On the one hand, the opinion to publicly share academic information is attractive for several reasons. Firstly, many people don't have the economic means to pay for the data, so they always wish the information is made for free. The student is a good case in point, they do not have a job that can make money so they hope to get free academic information to do the assignment. Secondly, some lifestyle information such as food or health information should be dispersed widely because of its usefulness for people. People's lives would be improved if they are aware of important knowledge such as proper diet or exercise.
On the other hand, there are a variety of reasons why I believe that people should secure or charge many kinds of information. The main shortcoming is that there are many important data that experts spend a lot of time and effort to research and collect, so it makes sense to pay to get them. For example, experts have to endure extreme conditions and take a long time to observe and document the life of a wild animal, so people should pay to get these materials. Additionally, some academic information such as corporate business strategy, and government private information should be locked. If this information were to be distributed freely and widely, this could have serious consequences for many people.
Weighing up both sides of the argument, although both views certainly have some validity, it seems to me that it is better to lock some kinds of valuable or vital academic information.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whether” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
Whether or not information should be revealed a...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'Whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: Whether
Whether or not information should be revealed as much ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 124, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...r several reasons. Firstly, many people dont have the economic means to pay for the ...
^^^^
Line 2, column 138, Rule ID: ECONOMIC_ECONOMICAL[1]
Message: Did you mean 'economical' (=affordable, cheap)?
Suggestion: economical
...ons. Firstly, many people dont have the economic means to pay for the data, so they alwa...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, while, for example, in short, such as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1592.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 331.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.80966767372 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26537283232 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73047608962 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.510574018127 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 520.2 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.341652436 49.4020404114 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 113.714285714 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6428571429 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.42857142857 7.06120827912 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.278191366981 0.244688304435 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10010153362 0.084324248473 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.048865768966 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.175862315242 0.151304729494 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0384702693762 0.056905535591 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 12.4159519038 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.12 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.