At present the mass media is very influential, and the lives of many people are affected by the news. Why do you think this is happening? Is this a positive or negative development?
Nowadays, in this contemporary epoch, there is an unprecedented controversial issue debating among critics as regard to importance of the mass media and its merits and demerits. In this regard, a plethora of contributing factors are associated with the influence of social media on human beings’ lives. Personally, I concur with the surmise that these platforms could bring about both irrefutable and adverse consequences. In the forthcoming paragraphs, I shall vividly highlight the contributing causes.
To commence with, there is no denying this conviction that countless factors could play an inevitable role regarding the mass media’s infiltration in all facets of individuals’ lives. Primarily, these days, news companies have an insatiable desire to disseminate various content of news, including current affairs, economics, politics, sports, weather and entertainment, in order to cover all needs of public interests. Due to this reason, there is a fierce competition emerging among news platforms in order to gain more the public’s attention, accordingly, they always apportion an immoderate amounts of budget on recruiting professional journalists, commentators and also producing popular programs. Take BBC as an epitome of news channels, it provides multi-lingual programs held all around the globe.
Personally, I perceive that the mass media could play as a double-edged sword. On the one hand, it could pose numerous advantages; as an exemplar, in many countries governments and political parties usually try to confine the freedom of express and guide the public attention towards their interests. As a result, they always censor the contents of news propagated in their communities, especially those are opposed to their intents. Thus, ubiquitous news websites and channels would diminish the authority of these decision-makers. On the other hand, news channels, alas, usually concentrate on adverse catastrophes, because these news always attract more audience, and this could desensitize people respecting predicaments that human beings now struggle with, such as poverty, famine, global warming and widespread diseases.
To conclude, there are many contributing reasons as to why some circle perceive that the mass media has permeated all facets of human beings’ lives; however, I feel this could bring about positive and negative ramifications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-06-12 | ashkan zaheri | 89 | view |
- The bar chart shows the literacy rate of people who can read and write byregion and gender in 2011 93
- Some people think that newspaper are the best way to learn about current events However others believe that they can learn news better through other media Discuss both views and give your opinion 95
- The graph below shows the proportion of renewable energy of the total supply in 2000 2004 and 2007 87
- Today more and more people use robots to do tasks at home and at work Do you think it is positive or negative why 11
- The maps below show Colwick Arts Centre in 2005 and today Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 93
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 595, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'amount'?
Suggestion: amount
...ly, they always apportion an immoderate amounts of budget on recruiting professional jo...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 626, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this news' or 'these newses'?
Suggestion: this news; these newses
...ntrate on adverse catastrophes, because these news always attract more audience, and this ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, however, if, regarding, so, thus, as to, i feel, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2029.0 1615.20841683 126% => OK
No of words: 352.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.76420454545 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33147354134 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1692209538 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.590909090909 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 619.2 506.74238477 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 70.996730307 49.4020404114 144% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.928571429 106.682146367 136% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1428571429 20.7667163134 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06120827912 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.194020290234 0.244688304435 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0646197330109 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0535256845906 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131656624995 0.151304729494 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0425653078797 0.056905535591 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.3 13.0946893788 140% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.18 50.2224549098 58% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.42 12.4159519038 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.62 8.58950901804 124% => OK
difficult_words: 128.0 78.4519038076 163% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 595, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'amount'?
Suggestion: amount
...ly, they always apportion an immoderate amounts of budget on recruiting professional jo...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 626, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this news' or 'these newses'?
Suggestion: this news; these newses
...ntrate on adverse catastrophes, because these news always attract more audience, and this ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, however, if, regarding, so, thus, as to, i feel, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2029.0 1615.20841683 126% => OK
No of words: 352.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.76420454545 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33147354134 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1692209538 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.590909090909 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 619.2 506.74238477 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 70.996730307 49.4020404114 144% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.928571429 106.682146367 136% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1428571429 20.7667163134 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06120827912 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.194020290234 0.244688304435 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0646197330109 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0535256845906 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131656624995 0.151304729494 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0425653078797 0.056905535591 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.3 13.0946893788 140% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.18 50.2224549098 58% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.42 12.4159519038 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.62 8.58950901804 124% => OK
difficult_words: 128.0 78.4519038076 163% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.