The graph below shows the percentage of Australian exports to 4 countries from 1990 to 2012.
The line chart elucidates the proportion of overseas products in Australia in 22 years since 1990, categorized by four nations such as Japan, the United States, China, and India. At a glance, Japanese and Chinese exports show downward and upward trends in the same period. However, the US and India suffered from the fluctuations related to Australian exports.
According to the graph, Australia initially cooperated with Japan at the highest rate of overseas items, at over one-fourth (25%), followed by nearly one-tenth (10%) of the US, while China and India had mostly similar percentages at small fractions. After a decade, the Japanese figure plunged significantly and maintained the same level until 2005, at which point the American figure fluctuated drastically, reaching its peak of over 10% in 2000 and hitting the lowest point of 5% five years later. China experienced a progressive upsurge of 5% in the five-year period when Indian exports stayed unchanged at about 2%.
The years 2005 and later showed an outstanding feature of China whose export proportions enormously grew and hit their peak of 25% and went upward to around 28%. Besides, the percentage of Japan was a slight reduction, although it stood in second place in terms of exports. Both the US and India suffered from the volatilities, the proportion of the US was higher compared to India in 2012, at 14% and 5%, respectively.
- In many countries children are becoming overweight and unhealthy Some people think that this is the responsibility of governments to solve the problem What extent do you agree or disagree 89
- In some countries if people need to find work they have to move away from their families and their friends Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 89
- In some countries more and more people are becoming interested in finding out about the history of the house or building they live in What are the reasons for this and how can people research this 84
- Explain some of the ways in which humans are damaging the environment What can governments do to address these problems What can individual people do 89
- Many people say the gap between rich and poor people is widening as rich people become richer and poor people grow poorer What problems could this situation cause and what measures can be taken to address those problems 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, however, if, second, while, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1173.0 965.302439024 122% => OK
No of words: 230.0 196.424390244 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89432290496 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7864138385 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 106.607317073 134% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.621739130435 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 351.0 283.868780488 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.0531482777 43.030603864 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.333333333 112.824112599 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5555555556 22.9334400587 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.88888888889 5.23603664747 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.150123492874 0.215688989381 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0624496563018 0.103423049105 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.03445958716 0.0843802449381 41% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106958898345 0.15604864568 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.041748474047 0.0819641961636 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.54 8.06136585366 118% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 40.7170731707 167% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.