"People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers."
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
All great actions or impart made in this world has followed more of logic than emotion in the sense that even scientific inventions or experiments leading to those inventions were done with the use of following logic and not emotions although emotion could have been the driving force of that invention, it is the logic being used to carry out that experment that makes it a good decision or not.
emotions are inevitably a good source of motivation to make things happen, lets consider the 9/11 attack in the United States that led the USgovernment to send its soldiers to irag to curb the increasing terrorism manifesting in that region which impact had been felt by the americans themselves however it was the logic behind that decision that they had manpower and impressive arsenal to fight that war that made the government good decision maker during that period, thomas alfred popular quote says that logic without emotion makes human toxic, the irrationality that makes all things feasible is what has led to humans even thinking of going to space.
we can say people who make decisions on emotion alone are poor decision maker because a clouded mind tends to make error in his dealings and spend more time in quickly fixings which might be fixable and seeing other factors as collateral damage that he/she can live with, which at the end of the day, if there is even a victory at all or a positive solution it would be recognised as a pyrrhic victory and if at all it is not then it would be a serendipitious victory, so agreeing that decisions made on emotion alone then justifying with logic later is a form of poor decision making is a great point because the decision maker is looking for how to make his decision sit well with himself or people he is explaining why he made that decision in the first place which brings us to why logic is an essential part in making any decision in the first place. Hasty decision based on anger and not contemplating how this reaction could cost valuable things and using logic to justify it later can be said of a man who goes to the white house without an appointment with the president or people working there and decides to open the gate just because he feels like entering the white house and after apprehended he justifies it by saying any americans should have the right to visit the white house becuse they voted for the leader living inthat house even though to him it sounds logical but for security purpose and welfare of the staff of the white house, he would be tagged as a mad man or a dangerous man who shouldn't be allowed to roam free until proper rehabilitation is done on him. from this point we can say logical after emotion is subjective and using the logic after the emotion is a chief trait of a poor decision maker.
in conclusion making decision with both logic and emotion simultaneously is what really makes a person a good decision maker for instance during the great recession that caused a lot of workers to be laid off, Emplyers who laid off most of their workers and justifying with the recession ended up closing up becuse they did not look for alternatives on how to diversify or adapt to the current situation of things some that tried reducing salaries and adding more services to their functions were able to scale through unscathed and s these leaders were seen as great decision makers.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-30 | yixova3193 | 66 | view |
| 2023-10-09 | Truss | 50 | view |
| 2023-10-04 | Adesina Boluwatito | 50 | view |
| 2023-10-01 | shamika@25 | 50 | view |
| 2023-09-14 | RIYA MODI | 58 | view |
- People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the pos 66
- All too often companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees such consultants would be unnecessary Write a response in which you discuss 50
- People most respect the powerful not when they exercise their power but when they refrain from exercising it Write an essay in which you develop and support a position on the statement above In writing your essay you should consider both when the statemen 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Emotions
...hat makes it a good decision or not. emotions are inevitably a good source of motivat...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: We
...even thinking of going to space. we can say people who make decisions on em...
^^
Line 7, column 54, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ople who make decisions on emotion alone are poor decision maker because a cloude...
^^
Line 7, column 311, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...h, which at the end of the day, if there is even a victory at all or a positive s...
^^
Line 7, column 1082, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ithout an appointment with the president or people working there and decides to o...
^^
Line 7, column 1330, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e house becuse they voted for the leader living inthat house even though to him i...
^^
Line 7, column 1514, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: shouldn't
...ged as a mad man or a dangerous man who shouldnt be allowed to roam free until proper re...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1591, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: From
...l proper rehabilitation is done on him. from this point we can say logical after emo...
^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...hief trait of a poor decision maker. in conclusion making decision with both lo...
^^
Line 9, column 586, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ers were seen as great decision makers.
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, look, really, so, then, well, for instance, in conclusion, in the first place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 29.0 19.5258426966 149% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 24.0 14.8657303371 161% => OK
Relative clauses : 26.0 11.3162921348 230% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 54.0 33.0505617978 163% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 81.0 58.6224719101 138% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 12.9106741573 147% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2794.0 2235.4752809 125% => OK
No of words: 600.0 442.535393258 136% => OK
Chars per words: 4.65666666667 5.05705443957 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.94923200384 4.55969084622 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45283282938 2.79657885939 88% => OK
Unique words: 287.0 215.323595506 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.478333333333 0.4932671777 97% => OK
syllable_count: 888.3 704.065955056 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 20.2370786517 30% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 100.0 23.0359550562 434% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 233.883636785 60.3974514979 387% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 465.666666667 118.986275619 391% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 100.0 23.4991977007 426% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 17.0 5.21951772744 326% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 7.80617977528 128% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 10.2758426966 19% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.373193374665 0.243740707755 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.193090290759 0.0831039109588 232% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0865044927868 0.0758088955206 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.211006119151 0.150359130593 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0779451750861 0.0667264976115 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 50.5 14.1392134831 357% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -21.56 48.8420337079 -44% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.92365168539 164% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 41.1 12.1743820225 338% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 10.93 12.1639044944 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.54 8.38706741573 138% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 100.480337079 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 27.5 11.8971910112 231% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 42.0 11.2143820225 375% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.