Some people think governments should care more about elderly while others think they should focus on investing in education for younger people. Discuss both views.
It is sometimes argued that governments should care more about senior citizens, while some people think that they ought to focus on funding education for younger generations. There is indeed a strong case to be made for both sides of the debate, which will be discussed now.
Proponents of elderly care often highlight the fact that members of this age group are prone to many physical impairments and require well-funded healthcare. For example, those with ageing-related diseases namely Alzheimer’s and dementia must be closely nursed by a medical professional at all times and treated with top-notch medical services. Given this, it is logical for governments to allocate more money for enhancing the quality and availability of senior healthcare services. In addition, considering that most elderly citizens have paid taxes to the government for decades, and many people of older generations are veterans who have fought in wars to bring about peace for their nation, they deserve to be recompensed by governments.
On the other hand, those advocating for investing in education believe that children should be emphasised since they are considered the “future” of every country. This is because they are expected to grow up to become productive citizens and workers and work hard to contribute to their country’s prosperity, which will be more possible if they are secured a proper education by their government. On this side of the debate, people also believe that since elderly people do not have much time left in their lives, there is no need to spend a lot of money on improving their living standards. Instead, governments should expend that money on education for young individuals to help with their personal growth and boost their knowledge and skills, inherently serving as a springboard for their future success in life.
In summary, it is my conviction that both elderly care and education for young people are extremely vital in their own ways, and it would be unwise to make such a blanket statement that governments should prioritise one over the other.
- Fossil fuel is the main source of energy In some countries the use of alternative sources of energy is encouraged To what extent do you think is it a positive or negative development 84
- Studies suggest that many teenagers these days prefer socialising online to meeting one another in person Why do you think this is the case What measures could be taken to encourage teenagers to spend more time meeting one another in person 89
- It is often claimed that electronic books will soon replace paper books Do you agree or disagree 78
- In some countries more and more adults are continuing to live with their parents even after they have completed education and found jobs Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 84
- Some students work while studying This often results in lacking time for education and constantly feeling under pressure What do you think are the causes of this What solutions can you suggest 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, well, while, for example, in addition, in summary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 24.0651302605 141% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1755.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 337.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20771513353 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28457229495 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81828196609 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.563798219585 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 551.7 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 20.2975951904 148% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 45.3680996165 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 159.545454545 106.682146367 150% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.6363636364 20.7667163134 148% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.90909090909 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.388723746929 0.244688304435 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.149568551768 0.084324248473 177% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.139426731956 0.0667982634062 209% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.262058819797 0.151304729494 173% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.117121082835 0.056905535591 206% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.4 13.0946893788 141% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.03 50.2224549098 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.53 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.25 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.1190380762 138% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.