There are an increasing number of people who do not know their neighbours. What causes this situation? How to solve it?
In the current contemporary society , the development of technologies and the momentous effect of the COVID-19 pandemic have minimized the contact between individuals. Hence, an increasing number of inhabitants tend to be more introverted and less communicative with their surrounding neighbours. The essay below will discuss and give the opinion to this issue somehow.
Stating with the first notion, modern technologies have influenced people to initiate conversation efforts through visual platforms rather than direct contacting. Therefore, although living in a high-density era, a majority of citizens cannot recognize or get interactions with their neighbours. Take the smart devices as an easy-seeing example, with every single meeting, people can easily make a contact in such a social website to hang out or transmit the information. Furthermore, several rules and accessories implemented during the current pandemic’s fight which have reduced the number of conservations among residents due to the distance limitation and society lockdown. Those can somehow make the distance between people much more from the connection.
Based on the current issue, although the pandemic has a substantial effect on the contact between inhabitants, there are still several certain solutions that can partly solve the mentioned happenings. For instance, the apartment representative can eliminate some laws when society controls the spread of disease or encourage citizens to set up online meetings to increase contact between home-owners. As a result, every single person can make a plethora of breakthroughs in social contact and recognize their neighbours much more conveniently. Through that kind of such a point, I more than believe, the connection between people, especially the neighbourhood could obviously be strengthened and rooted.
In conclusion, with the try as well as the efforts which the mentioned solutions above, it is not hard for people to be confident and have an open mind when starting a conservation with their neighbours in the current world situation. Nevertheless, each inhabitant might be able to learn and get themselves more sociable to avoid being insensitive and scared of the outside environment in the near future for all the good connections between humans.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2022-09-07 | Luisjackiet | 84 | view |
2022-09-07 | tung0303 | view | |
2022-09-07 | tung0303 | 56 | view |
2022-09-04 | Luisjackiet | 67 | view |
2022-09-04 | Luisjackiet | 78 | view |
- There are an increasing number of people who do not know their neighbours What causes this situation How to solve it 78
- With growing population in cities more and more people live in a home with small or no outdoor areas Is it a positive or negative development 78
- Some people say that modern technology has made shopping today easier while others disagree Discuss both views and give your opinion 61
- You should spend about 40 minutes on this task Different people have different approaches to life Some prefer daily routines while others enjoy having new experiences Which category do you fall into and why Give reasons for your answer and use specific ex 78
- Social and modern trends are difficult to follow these days and it s widely believed that they primarily exist just to make the living more colorful especially online Some people believe that we shouldn t follow them and that we should live in what we are 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 36, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
In the current contemporary society , the development of technologies and the...
^^
Line 3, column 680, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this can' or 'Those cans'?
Suggestion: This can; Those cans
...stance limitation and society lockdown. Those can somehow make the distance between peopl...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, hence, nevertheless, so, still, then, therefore, well, for instance, in conclusion, kind of, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1953.0 1615.20841683 121% => OK
No of words: 345.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.66086956522 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3097767484 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1468520786 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.582608695652 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 594.9 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.3952077926 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.5 106.682146367 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6428571429 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.71428571429 7.06120827912 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.129037781624 0.244688304435 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0450642488281 0.084324248473 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0414765705496 0.0667982634062 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0828720439556 0.151304729494 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0223051075 0.056905535591 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 13.0946893788 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.84 12.4159519038 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.72 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 78.4519038076 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.