Some people say that what children watch on TV influences their behaviour while others say the amount of time children they spend watching Tv influences their behavior.
Discuss both views and give your opinion
Some people suggest that it is not how much time children spend watching television that has an impact on their behaviour, but rather the content of what they watch, while others disagree. Personally, I think both of these factors can have an impact on a child’s behaviour, especially when the two factors are combined.
Firstly, over the last decade or two, there has been a steady increase in the amount of inappropriate content that has been allowed to be televised. Television programmes and commercials these days are full of graphic violence, sex scenes and sexual connotations, amongst other topics that are considered unsuitable for children’s viewing. Even cartoon programmes these days are full of violence. Young children are the most affected by this issue due to the fact that they are still learning and developing ideas about the world. Being exposed to such content can negatively shape their views and personal relationships, and therefore affect their behaviour.
However, not only does the content of what children watch affect their behaviour but also how much time they spend watching television. In most modern societies it is very common for young children to spend hours of their day with their eyes glued to the television screen. Many children watch television as soon as they wake up in the morning and as soon as they come home from school. Many parents even consider the television to be like a baby-sitter, something to keep their children occupied. Unfortunately, this has many detrimental effects on children’s behaviour, the primary reason being that most children suffer from a severe lack of outdoor activity and exercise, which are vital for a child’s well-being and development.
In conclusion, I believe that both what children watch and how much time they spend watching television can impact their behaviour. Governing authorities should consider more stringent regulations when it comes to television programme content and parents need to be more careful about how much time their children spend watching television every day to avoid the negative implications that it can have on their children’s behaviour.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-11-09 | hueyy | 67 | view |
| 2021-04-27 | dhruv j patel | 61 | view |
| 2021-04-27 | dhruv j patel | 56 | view |
| 2020-05-03 | thenaolayeu112 | 89 | view |
| 2020-02-29 | Dung132 | 78 | view |
- Some people think that it is best to live in a horizontal city while others think of a vertical city Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
- People today do not feel safe either at home or when they are out What are the causes What are the solutions 73
- Some believe that it is good for a country s culture to import films and TV programmes while others think it is better for a country to have their own films and TV programmes Discuss both views and give your own opinion 67
- The consumption of the world s resources is increasing at a dangerous rate What are the causes and solutions 56
- Some believe that it is good for a country s culture to import films and TV programmes while others think it is better for a country to have their own films and TV programmes Discuss both views and give your own opinion 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, so, still, therefore, well, while, i think, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 24.0651302605 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1825.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 344.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.30523255814 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30665032142 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82835392496 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.508720930233 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 542.7 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.4544563689 49.4020404114 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.357142857 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5714285714 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.64285714286 7.06120827912 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.34286169811 0.244688304435 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.140162740505 0.084324248473 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.117226602226 0.0667982634062 175% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.238963765467 0.151304729494 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0693565414805 0.056905535591 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.