Cyclists and car drivers sharing the same roads causes some problems. What are the problems and what can be done to reduce them?
In many places around the world, cyclists and drivers are occupying the same lanes, which is attributed to precarious risks. There, nevertheless, are feasible solutions to alleviate this issue.
The first and foremost issue stemming from bikes and cars being on the same road is the interruption to traffic flow. The discrepancies in speed between two vehicle types can disturb the normal flow of road transport when, for example, a vehicle intends to take a turn or when a high-speed vehicle goes after a low-speed one. Another existential threat is that both cyclists and automobiles are exposed to grave risks of accidents while in the same lane. Every year, multifarious cases of fatal collisions are alarmingly reported. Meanwhile, riders who were only preserved by helmets are always put in greater jeopardy compared to drivers that have better protection such as airbags and seatbelts equipped in cars thus shared roads are a fatal menace to riders.
Notwithstanding the aforementioned potential dangers, a number of measures are advised. Firstly, aside from strict punishments imposed on convictions against road safety enhancement, regulations concerning the maximum speed of large vehicles should be adopted to crack down on accidents deriving from overspeed. Secondly, the state budget should be spent on designing separate roads owing to the distinct functions of each means of transportation so that they can travel simultaneously. Finally, in cities whose total area is limited for transportation, the municipality can set up a timeframe for each type of vehicle. For instance, scheduling operating time specified for giant trucks carrying containers from 11:00 pm to 4:00 am when most individual commuters are resting can deter lethal crashes faced by the smaller ones.
In conclusion, though pairing on one road between cyclists and automobiles conspicuously results in hazardous repercussions, there exists a multitude of remedies for this issue.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-15 | Phuong1810 | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-24 | bibiane chou | 84 | view |
| 2023-06-19 | Đặng Luân | 73 | view |
| 2022-11-16 | chaupnh | 89 | view |
| 2022-08-05 | minayoung | 61 | view |
- In the future it seems it will be more difficult to live on the Earth Some people think more money should be spent on researching other planets to live such as Mars To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 73
- Some people believe government should spend money on building train and subway lines to reduce traffic congestion Others think that building more and wider roads is the better way to reduce traffic congestion Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
- The only way to improve road safety is to give much stricter punishments on driving offenses To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Increasing travels between countries enable people to learn different cultures or to increase tension between people from different countries 90
- In some countries small town centre shops are going out of business because people tend to drive to large out of town stores As a result people without cars have limited access to out of town stores and this may result in an increase in the use of cars Do 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, firstly, if, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, thus, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 24.0651302605 25% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1664.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 303.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.49174917492 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05910508666 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6699669967 0.561755894193 119% => OK
syllable_count: 511.2 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.2853516916 49.4020404114 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.0 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3076923077 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1538461538 7.06120827912 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.67935871743 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.158519880051 0.244688304435 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0506500757514 0.084324248473 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0420003247788 0.0667982634062 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0873540646563 0.151304729494 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0332638976969 0.056905535591 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.0946893788 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.86 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.56 8.58950901804 123% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 78.4519038076 141% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.