The advancement of internet technology means people do not need to travel to foreign countries to understand how people in other places live.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
The internet has made it possible for people to learn almost anything about the culture of people in another country. Although this is true, learning about the cultures and customs of another country via a computer screen is vastly different to actually experiencing them first-hand.
Given the ever-increasing number of online vlogs on social networking sites, it is possible to travel across the world while enjoying the comfort of one’s private room. This is due to the fact that in attempt to attract custom to a particular destination, numerous content creators have been employed to produce videos featuring a selection of stunning aspects of that place, and as this trend continues, more original clips will certainly be shot to outdo previous ones, promoting a stiff competition in luring visitors. As a result, those scarcely having intention of visiting far-flung locations can benefit immensely from such cascade of footages - viewing experiences which were not as available in the past when travel magazines and publications were primary sources of information for the majority.
Despite such apparent advantage, the difference between what one exposes to on screens and what is in reality is, nevertheless, immense, thus making visitors’ in-person experiences more invaluable. In fact, producers of online videos can only give narrow interpretation of what they have seen, due to required limits on the length of a clip. Furthermore, there are certain aspects that are impossible to convey to our senses, such as smell and taste of local cuisines. For these reasons, were an individual to resort to virtual tours for travel, one would miss a great many indelible experiences. More significantly, being able to have a first-hand account of local traditions and customs could help a person properly appreciate their beauty and probably imbibe them, which obviously can enrich one’s life. In combination, it is safe to say these are elements that are unable to experience via screens although they are not necessarily desirable to everyone.
In conclusion, even though traveling through online tours in form of videos is an option that many people gravitate towards for different reasons, it is more beneficial to have a real experience of a place as not only one can be enlightened but also entertained by the unique characteristics of that place.
- Some people say that school children should be mainly taught about the literature e g fiction and poetry of their own country because it is more important than that of other countries To what extent do you agree 90
- Important historical objects in museums around the world should be returned to their country of origin To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Some people think thay the tendency of human beings to copy one another is shown in the popularity of fashion clothes and other consumer goods To what extent do you agree or disagree 87
- some believe that Increasing travels between countries enables people to learn different cultures However others think this can increase tension between people from different countries Discuss both views and give your opinion 93
- As The Number Of Cars Increases More Money Has To Be Spent On Road System Some People Think That The Government Should Pay For This Others However Think That The Users Should Pay For The Cost Discuss Both Views And Give Your Opinion 61
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, furthermore, if, nevertheless, so, thus, while, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 41.998997996 138% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1999.0 1615.20841683 124% => OK
No of words: 376.0 315.596192385 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3164893617 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40348946061 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95208185366 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 228.0 176.041082164 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.606382978723 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 634.5 506.74238477 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 20.2975951904 153% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 74.5048469713 49.4020404114 151% => OK
Chars per sentence: 166.583333333 106.682146367 156% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.3333333333 20.7667163134 151% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 7.06120827912 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0898849226191 0.244688304435 37% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0340163050025 0.084324248473 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0416420134826 0.0667982634062 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0645797123788 0.151304729494 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0321357100165 0.056905535591 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.3 13.0946893788 147% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.55 50.2224549098 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.6 11.3001002004 147% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.17 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.09 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 117.0 78.4519038076 149% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.1190380762 142% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, furthermore, if, nevertheless, so, thus, while, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 41.998997996 138% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1999.0 1615.20841683 124% => OK
No of words: 376.0 315.596192385 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3164893617 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40348946061 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95208185366 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 228.0 176.041082164 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.606382978723 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 634.5 506.74238477 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 20.2975951904 153% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 74.5048469713 49.4020404114 151% => OK
Chars per sentence: 166.583333333 106.682146367 156% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.3333333333 20.7667163134 151% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 7.06120827912 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0898849226191 0.244688304435 37% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0340163050025 0.084324248473 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0416420134826 0.0667982634062 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0645797123788 0.151304729494 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0321357100165 0.056905535591 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.3 13.0946893788 147% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.55 50.2224549098 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.6 11.3001002004 147% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.17 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.09 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 117.0 78.4519038076 149% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.1190380762 142% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.