Some people think history has nothing or little to tell us, but others think that studying the past history can help us better understand the present. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
In contemporary civilization, while one school of thought holds that informing citizens through history is impractical, another one claims that learning these fields has the ability to gain more understanding of the current societies’ state. Personally, I side with the latter view.
On the one hand, it is transparent that there is a fraction or even none for individuals to absorb information from the former times. One of the reasons is that several conclusions from past events cannot be applied to the modern world. For instance, in the past, cavalry was essential for numerous key battles, but now it does not. Hence, there might be some historically outdated set of data that is invaluable. In addition, these historical stories could be fabrications or myths. That is owing to the fact that those that are passed on orally for generations cannot be proven true. Taking Christopher Columbus as a notable example, he is commonly thought of as a pioneer in discovering the American continent, but it turns out that a Viking actually inhabited Canada decades ago. Consequently, those incorrect beliefs could mislead citizens to recognise the data improperly.
On the other hand, absorbing history also has a plethora of benefits. Firstly, history provides us with layers of experience through millennials so as not to be trapped in the identical mistakes that happened in the past. As a result, it is easier to mitigate the possibility of being in extremely troubling situations. Furthermore, it is claimed to have more profound insight into the evolution of countries by history. In fact, the cultural, economic and political aspects of a country, which is deemed to be complex, can be encapsulated to be simple via folks. Henceforth, the world’s current state could be inclusively grasped.
In conclusion, while it is justifiable that history has a minimal amount of information to tell, I hold a firm belief that its merits surpass its demerits.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-19 | Xaxaxaxa | 61 | view |
| 2023-01-30 | Charles Le | 89 | view |
| 2023-01-16 | Charles Le | 73 | view |
| 2023-01-04 | adamneyul | 73 | view |
| 2022-12-20 | 지아 진 | 84 | view |
- Rich countries often give money to poorer countries but it does not solve poverty Therefore developed countries should give other types of help to poor countries rather than financial aid To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Some people think history has nothing or little to tell us but others think that studying the past history can help us better understand the present Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
- As machines have become more sophisticated more and more jobs and tasks involving physical hard work can be done automatically Do the positive effects of this trend outweigh the negative effects 89
- Some countries achieve international success by building specialized facilities to train top athletes instead of providing sports facilities that everyone can use Is it a positive or negative development 89
- Any country should be able to sell goods to other countries without the restrictions of the government Do you agree or disagree 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 79, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lso has a plethora of benefits. Firstly, history provides us with layers of exper...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, consequently, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, if, so, while, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 13.1623246493 175% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1651.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 317.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20820189274 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03058543008 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.608832807571 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 519.3 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.7440507823 49.4020404114 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.1176470588 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6470588235 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.82352941176 7.06120827912 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 3.4128256513 264% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.101557000166 0.244688304435 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0302681169128 0.084324248473 36% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0397661504348 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0637655229907 0.151304729494 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0249402696979 0.056905535591 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.71 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 78.4519038076 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.