The graph below shows the number of overseas visitors to three different areas in a European country between 1987 and 2007. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The given graph provides a comparison of the number of oversea tourists in three areas in a Europe country from 1987 to 2007.
From an overall perspective, it is evident that all three areas enjoyed an upward trend
Looking at the chart for more details, it is evident that, in 1987, the number of the coast was the highest, at 40 thousand people. The figure for the mountains was lower, at precisely 20 thousand people. The figure for the lakes, however, accounted for the lowest number, at 10 thousand people.
For the rest of the chart, in the period from 1992 to 2007, the coast saw a rapid increase, about 37 thousand people, and reached a peak of about 75 thousand people. There was also an increase in the number of the mountain, from nearly 25 thousand people to over 30 thousand people. For the lakes, it witnessed a dramatically increased in the number of visitors, from approximately 25 thousand people in 1992 to nearly 75 thousand people in 2002. After that, it also saw a decline to 50 thousand people at the end.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-01-16 | honguyenlily | 67 | view |
| 2023-11-02 | tracywu | 73 | view |
| 2023-10-23 | Giang Tran | 61 | view |
| 2023-10-23 | Giang Tran | 61 | view |
| 2023-10-23 | Giang Tran | 67 | view |
- It is much more convenient to watch a movie on television or computer than buy a ticket and go to the cinema In the near future the popularity of cinemas will drastically decline Do you agree or disagree 61
- Annual rice production 67
- The maps below show the layouts of nature Museum between 2010 and 2013 42
- How sugar is produced from sugar cane
- Comparison of energy production 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, look, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 859.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 184.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.66847826087 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68302321012 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49900145465 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 89.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.483695652174 0.547539520022 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 243.9 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 10.0 3.36585365854 297% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.8522817933 43.030603864 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.375 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.875 5.23603664747 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0999936718098 0.215688989381 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.063159859202 0.103423049105 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.104397081941 0.0843802449381 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113396656652 0.15604864568 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.127498759418 0.0819641961636 156% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.51 61.2550243902 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.1 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.87 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.