When a country develops its technology, the traditional skills and ways of life die out. It is pointless to try and keep them alive. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
With the increase in technological advancement in the nation, the old ability and the method of living start disappearing which is useless to attempt and secure. I completely agree with the opinion as many outdated ways of working are already disappeared and they almost become futile now.
There are many traditional things and process which probably don’t understand by today’s juveniles. They were the part of our father’s and grandfather’s life. For example, the traditional method of milling and grinding in miller ‘Dhiki’ and grinder ‘Jaato’ is almost diminished now. While they used to be the aspect of our ancestor’s life, the kids nowadays are unaware of them. They don’t find it as an effective method of grinding and milling. Hence, I agree with the argument of using such traditions are now pointless and also to keep them alive.
As machine technology is increasing, people are becoming less busy and also lazy. The way of agriculture is now almost changed as compared to old ages. For instance, Nepalese people used oxen to sow a cultivation land which used time and energy. But in modern days they stop nourishing them and utilize modern tractors and others agricultural equipment to sow farmland. The people who used traditional method for scattering started saying that the method they used to grow crops are now futile. As these methods are pointless to try today and trying to keep them alive is just like a crazy thing, I completely agree the argument about technological development.
In conclusion, with the increase in machinery progress, the method people used years ago are now vanishing. Also, as these evolution saves our time and also increase productivity, the idea of trying them today and securing them are just fruitless. However, it is important to illustrate the coming generations a traditional way of living.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-02-28 | InamAli | 84 | view |
| 2023-01-20 | Guiseppe59192 | 73 | view |
| 2021-04-28 | sattar_iust | 89 | view |
| 2021-04-04 | maryyrle | 67 | view |
| 2021-02-03 | Amnusheenh | 73 | view |
- In their advertising businesses nowadays usually emphasize that their products are new in some way Why is this Do you think it is a positive or negative development Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or 73
- Food can be produced much more cheaply today because of improved fertilizers and better machinery However some of the methods used to do this may be dangerous to human health and may have negative effects on local communities What are the advantage s and 61
- It is better to be unemployed in jobs rather than to be employed in jobs even if they don t feel happy or enjoy Do you agree or disagree 78
- The charts below show the number of Japanese tourists travelling abroad between 1985 and 1995 and Australia s share of the Japanese tourist market Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below
- Because of modern technology some people believe that it is no longer necessary for people to learn handwriting skills but others believe that handwriting is still an important skill Discuss both views and give your opinion based on your experience 89
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, so, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 7.85571142285 0% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1567.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 303.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17161716172 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88595698621 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.531353135314 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 498.6 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.8803843724 49.4020404114 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.1764705882 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8235294118 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.82352941176 7.06120827912 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.186282950407 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0623642989092 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0609454065488 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119822724896 0.151304729494 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0117079991979 0.056905535591 21% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.0946893788 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.41 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.7 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, so, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 7.85571142285 0% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1567.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 303.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17161716172 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88595698621 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.531353135314 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 498.6 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.8803843724 49.4020404114 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.1764705882 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8235294118 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.82352941176 7.06120827912 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.186282950407 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0623642989092 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0609454065488 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119822724896 0.151304729494 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0117079991979 0.056905535591 21% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.0946893788 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.41 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.7 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.