Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Part of the people consider reading the subject of students’ own will, while the remaining believe compulsory learning of some long-term functional stream like science and technology in the university. This essay examines both the views with illustrations of some useful examples.
On the one hand, individuals assume studying the university subject of their curiosity which is going to be beneficial for them. In other words, if someone graduates in the subject of his interest, he will excel in every corner of that field. Some other subject that has been forced to read by others will not be as fruitful as the subject read by their own. For example, the research conducted by Churchill University in Japan found that 90% of successful people in the Funaki state have got their degree in the study stream that had been chosen by themselves. Moreover, the same study showed 65% of students who had been reading in their university, had poor result compared to 95% of scholars who achieved high grades after reading the subject of their choice. Thus, it is essential to read the course whatever they like.
On the other hand, in this cutting-edge era, the field of science and technology is expanding in rapid pace. To explain it, as the new discoveries had been made, the employment rate is increasing, and people starts arguing science and technology to be an indispensable subject for university. For example, in 2019, the research conducted by Pentagon University showed that, 75% of vacancy for employment in Spain were of technical and science fields. In addition, the study executed by scientists of ‘researchgate.com’ in 2022 reflected that 90% of research papers since 2010 on the website were of technical fields, suggesting there are numerous topics to be excelled by the PhD students if they are from the field of science and technology. Hence, people think this field as compulsory subjects to be taught in the university.
In conclusion, although the field of study and employment in science and technology is rising, I opine in the favor of former thinkers, as studying the subject of one’s will not only makes him proficient in that field but also helps him securing good marks in the subject. Given the above, it is recommended that there will be freedom to choose the subject of interest in the university; however, one subject related to the science and technology must be made compulsory.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-05-09 | trpg143 | 73 | view |
| 2023-12-13 | mary.ssherr | 73 | view |
| 2023-11-16 | phamquanghmu | 56 | view |
| 2023-09-20 | VanChungNguyen | 73 | view |
| 2023-09-20 | VanChungNguyen | 67 | view |
- It is better to be unemployed in jobs rather than to be employed in jobs even if they don t feel happy or enjoy Do you agree or disagree 78
- When a country develops its technology the traditional skills and ways of life die out It is pointless to try and keep them alive To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 73
- Countries are becoming more and more similar because people are able to buy the same products anywhere in the world Do you think is a positive or negative development 73
- The charts below show the number of Japanese tourists travelling abroad between 1985 and 1995 and Australia s share of the Japanese tourist market Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below
- Improvements in health education and trade are essential for the development of poorer nations However the governments of richer nations should take more responsibility for helping the poorer nations in such areas To what extent do you agree or disagree w 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 184, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[3]
Message: The verb 'will' requires base form of the verb: 'make'
Suggestion: make
...ying the subject of one’s will not only makes him proficient in that field but also h...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 238, Rule ID: ADVISE_VBG[9]
Message: The verb 'help' is used with infinitive: 'to secure' or 'secure'.
Suggestion: to secure; secure
...icient in that field but also helps him securing good marks in the subject. Given the ab...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, moreover, so, thus, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 70.0 41.998997996 167% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2019.0 1615.20841683 125% => OK
No of words: 402.0 315.596192385 127% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0223880597 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.47771567384 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84901030732 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 176.041082164 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.495024875622 0.561755894193 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 613.8 506.74238477 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 67.7288712441 49.4020404114 137% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.6 106.682146367 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.8 20.7667163134 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.8 7.06120827912 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.346743766277 0.244688304435 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.120294890972 0.084324248473 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0469508096649 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.213095851042 0.151304729494 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0108302860176 0.056905535591 19% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 50.2224549098 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.