The crime rate nowadays is decreasing compared to the past due to advanced technology which can prevent and solve the crime. Do you agree or disagree?
Solving the crime rate has always been one of the top priorities that raises concern in nations worldwide. There is no doubt that the prospect of modern technology does us many good in every aspect, including the criminal field. From my standpoint, I totally see eye to eye that technology helps police officers as well as the government detect illegal activities and raise human awareness.
It cannot deny that technology does wonders for humans in many areas, making contributions to improving the quality of life, particularly bringing down the crime rate. The first advantage springs from saving time to tracing offenders. This is because, with the support of cutting-edge technology, the police force can be conducive to detecting inmates effectively before they pose a threat to innocent people. As a result, chances are the local authority will intervene in illegal activities as well as deter crime from being committed. A clear example is cameras or CCTV, there are many cases based on the recording of cameras security, and home surveillance equipment, functional forces are likely to limit the crime zone, thereby identifying the offender in a short time.
Another advantage lies in raising the awareness of people, particularly the youth. Due to the fact that nowadays every young person may own an intelligent device in order to keep up with the hectic life pace, both the government and other organizations can launch a variety of campaigns to introduce laws in popularity. Accordingly, residents will have a depth perception of their behaviors and recognize the committed activities to avoid. Furthermore, thanks to the network security systems, the government has a sustainable barrier to prevent cybercrime from posting fake news with the aim of disturbing the countries’ politics.
In conclusion, the advantages of technical inventions that have been mentioned above are persuasive explanations for the reduction of criminals nowadays.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-01-27 | tieuquynh | 84 | view |
| 2022-09-08 | Charles Le | 84 | view |
| 2022-08-03 | chinh11111 | 78 | view |
| 2022-01-25 | ngannguyen2408 | 78 | view |
| 2022-01-25 | ngannguyen2408 | 11 | view |
- Topic The graph below shows the proportion of types of magazines sold by the company in 1975 1995 and 2015 84
- Even though governments have worked hard to bring about improvements in the healthcare system the overall standard of physical health in developed countries is decreasing What are the potential reasons for this and what are some of the long term effects 78
- Topic The pie charts show the size of classes in primary schools in four states in Australia in 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- It is a natural process for animal species to become extinct e g dinosaurs dodos There is no reason why people should try to prevent this from happening Do you agree or disagree 84
- The table below gives information about the values NZ of exports of kiwi fruit from New Zealand to five countries between 2010 and 2012 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 279, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tandpoint, I totally see eye to eye that technology helps police officers as well...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, but, first, furthermore, if, may, so, well, in conclusion, no doubt, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1658.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 307.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.4006514658 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97594396899 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.644951140065 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 531.9 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.9409682723 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.538461538 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6153846154 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.07692307692 7.06120827912 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.144359367279 0.244688304435 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0427938968378 0.084324248473 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0453556816962 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0696034980022 0.151304729494 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0458102268572 0.056905535591 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.34 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.23 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.