Task 2: Rich countries often give money to poorer countries, but it does not solve poverty. Therefore, developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is argued that financial support from wealthy nations does not decrease the poverty rate in poorer ones, and the other types of useful aid would be more significant. From my viewpoint, I totally agree with this statement because professional workforce and the acquisition of technology are also two of the most crucial factors solving the destitution.
To begin with, sustainable growth does not merely depend upon money, but also on well-trained workforce. Expertise people in different fields such as education, healthcare or agriculture make contributions to diminish poverty as they can create products which make profit. For example, Korea has an annual turnover of billions by virtue of Shine muscat grapes which are meticulously cultivated by professional farmers. However, third-world nations often lack of experience and skills to train their employees. Therefore, the support in term of professionals with training programs from well-off countries is crucial for the development of poor nations.
Another aid developing countries can give to needy ones is technology transfer. In the cutting edge of advanced technology, sustainable development necessitates modern digital equipment as an effective way to boost the prospective of a nation. To illustrate, technological devices can create a large number of products and support labours in arduous manufacturing process, which enables a country to own a multitude of valuable outputs as a way to improve its development. As such, technological support from poverished countries should be offered in some sections such as argiculture or healthcare to indigent parts of the world in order to help them remove poverty.
In conclusion, financial aid is essential, but not the only way for a poor nation to develop its wealth. I strongly believe that developed nations should provide the poorer ones with expert crews and technology sharings to enhance their living standards.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-01-04 | honguyenlily | 73 | view |
| 2023-11-29 | Alexanderpopov | 56 | view |
| 2023-11-02 | tracywu | 84 | view |
| 2023-10-31 | thaokim2003 | 89 | view |
| 2023-10-23 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
- Rich countries often give money to poorer countries but it does not solve poverty Therefore developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Task 2 Rich countries often give money to poorer countries but it does not solve poverty Therefore developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Task 2 Rich countries often give money to poorer countries but it does not solve poverty Therefore developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Task 2 Rich countries often give money to poorer countries but it does not solve poverty Therefore developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 292, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...trate, technological devices can create a large number of products and support labours in arduous...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, therefore, third, well, for example, in conclusion, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1642.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 297.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.52861952862 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10112891264 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.622895622896 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 510.3 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.9809762495 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.307692308 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8461538462 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.84615384615 7.06120827912 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.224491955668 0.244688304435 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0755398770651 0.084324248473 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0649812145806 0.0667982634062 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122786810983 0.151304729494 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0345310279578 0.056905535591 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.0946893788 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.09 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.94 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.