Task 2: Some people think that physical strength is important for success in sport, while other people think that mental strength is more important. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
It is incontrovertible that being mentally and physically strong is an indispensable part to achieve success in sports. While there is a widespread belief that no sportsperson can reach the top without a good mentality, I firmly believe that outstanding physical strength is far more crucial.
On the one hand, it is undeniable that mental quality can be considered of paramount importance to overcome many obstacles in sports. Firstly, if the athletes cannot foster a competitive spirit or even a win-at-all-costs attitude, it is impossible for them to possess an adequate commitment to pursue their lifelong careers. Hours allocated in the gyms or training centers, for example, may be sometimes repetitive and frustrating, and accordingly, an unflinching will to practice is of paramount importance for the athletes to stay focused. Secondly, during the training and competition period, falling prey to undesirable injuries or failures is inevitable. In these circumstances, a superior mentality is vitally essential to overcome the feeling of pain and disappointment. Furthermore, these days, due to the massive development of social networking sites, sports coverages tend to promote their reputation or maximize their profits using several exaggerated news, which may encourage sports fans to condemn a certain sportsperson. Thus, if the athletes fail to hold a laid-back attitude towards these criticisms, it will be impossible for them to control their emotions and move up to a career ladder.
On the other hand, despite the aforementioned benefits obtained from a strong mentality, I would also argue that athletes cannot gain more success or set records without superior physical strength. Although many people take up sports merely to get into shape or to keep fit, those who wish to gain a personal best or to reach the top must possess competitive physical strength. Obvious examples of physically demanding sports are weightlifting and judo, which require great stamina and endurance to gain more advantages when competing with other opponents. Furthermore, several sports stars, including Lance Armstrong, have also used illegal substances and performance-enhancing drugs in order to remain at the peak of his condition over the time training and competitions.
In conclusion, while mental strength is undoubtedly crucial, I firmly agree with the view that a successful career in sports must go hand-in-hand with good physical strength.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-28 | Phuong1810 | 89 | view |
| 2023-08-02 | Shinycorn122 | 56 | view |
| 2023-07-27 | mike123 | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-24 | Đặng Quỳnh Như | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-22 | Zeroplague0407 | 73 | view |
- Task 2 Many countries import large amounts of food from other parts of the world Is this a positive or negative development 84
- Task 2 Some cities create housing for their growing population by providing taller buildings Other cities create housing by building on wider areas of land Which solution is better 78
- Task 1 The maps show a beautiful beachfront area in Australia in 1950 and today Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Nowadays people depend on technology for leisure activities Is this a positive or negative development 89
- Task 2 Some people think that hosting an international sports event is good for the country while some people think it is bad Discuss both views and state your opinion 89
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 175, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nd-in-hand with good physical strength.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, first, firstly, furthermore, if, may, second, secondly, so, thus, while, for example, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2082.0 1615.20841683 129% => OK
No of words: 376.0 315.596192385 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.53723404255 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40348946061 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.27137173361 2.80592935109 117% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 176.041082164 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.579787234043 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 645.3 506.74238477 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 40.2083857636 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 148.714285714 106.682146367 139% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.8571428571 20.7667163134 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.78571428571 7.06120827912 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.232315037804 0.244688304435 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0716343930769 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0545629443889 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148570050874 0.151304729494 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0438517734766 0.056905535591 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.1 13.0946893788 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 50.2224549098 73% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.15 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.67 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 78.4519038076 144% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 175, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nd-in-hand with good physical strength.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, first, firstly, furthermore, if, may, second, secondly, so, thus, while, for example, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2082.0 1615.20841683 129% => OK
No of words: 376.0 315.596192385 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.53723404255 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40348946061 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.27137173361 2.80592935109 117% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 176.041082164 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.579787234043 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 645.3 506.74238477 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 40.2083857636 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 148.714285714 106.682146367 139% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.8571428571 20.7667163134 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.78571428571 7.06120827912 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.232315037804 0.244688304435 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0716343930769 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0545629443889 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148570050874 0.151304729494 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0438517734766 0.056905535591 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.1 13.0946893788 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 50.2224549098 73% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.15 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.67 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 78.4519038076 144% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.