Some children spend hours every day on their smartphones.
Why is this the case? Do you think this is a positive or a negative development?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Write at least 250 words.
I personally believe that this trend has both benefits and drawbacks.
There are two primary disadvantages of using smartphones for long hours in children. The first negative is spending too much time on cell phones has an adverse impact on children’s health. Kids who devote time to playing games or watching videos on digital phones without taking any regular exercise may suffer from various health problems such as sleep quality reduced, eye strain, or obesity. Another drawback is the more time children spend on digital screens, the less time they spend taking part in social activities with their friends or talking with their families. This is the reason why it may lead to social isolation and lacking communication skills which seriously affects their lives in the future.
Despite the downsides mentioned above, using smartphones brings a wide range of benefits. Firstly, smartphones help children enrich their novel knowledge. A child, for example, can learn some terms about smartphones in the technology field and thus are more likely to raise up their passion for the information technology industry. Secondly, children have more opportunities to make friends and get help from all over the world by using social networking sites such as Facebook, Twitter, and so on without any restrictions. My friend who I knew from Facebook and now is living in America is a case in point. When she came to Vietnam, I became her tour guide introducing her to Vietnam’s heritage and foods.
In conclusion, I would argue that the appearance of smartphone development brings both beneficial and detrimental effects.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-12-21 | tsln7607 | 78 | view |
| 2023-09-01 | hinhin411 | 84 | view |
| 2023-08-12 | nle2006 | 67 | view |
| 2023-08-02 | tran quynh | 73 | view |
| 2023-08-02 | tran quynh | 70 | view |
- It is important for people to take risks both in their professional lives and their personal lives Do you think the advantages of taking risks outweigh the disadvantages Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledg 84
- The diagrams show changes to a medical centre from 2008 to 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Some children spend hours every day on their smartphones Why is this the case Do you think this is a positive or a negative development Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience Write at least 250 73
- The charts below give information on Internet use at home in Australia between 2010 and 2011 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant 67
- In some countries if people need to find work they have to move away from their families and their friends Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 78
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, may, second, secondly, so, thus, for example, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1370.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 260.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26923076923 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78314878506 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.665384615385 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 410.4 506.74238477 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.088108274 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.384615385 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.46153846154 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.19745712645 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0649965700213 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0336973382709 0.0667982634062 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.097051740673 0.151304729494 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0421368909552 0.056905535591 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.94 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, may, second, secondly, so, thus, for example, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1370.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 260.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26923076923 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78314878506 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.665384615385 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 410.4 506.74238477 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.088108274 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.384615385 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.46153846154 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.19745712645 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0649965700213 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0336973382709 0.0667982634062 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.097051740673 0.151304729494 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0421368909552 0.056905535591 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.94 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.