Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on specific points made in the reading passage.
The reading and the lecture are both about the American multinational corporations adapting a uniform code of American ethics internationally also. The lecturer casts the doubt on the reading passage by providing three disadvantages of implementing such uniform code of ethics internationally .
According to the reading text, one of the greatest benefits of such policy would be increased safety since American safety regulation are more strict. The lecturer opposes the claim by stating that “ When in Rome, do as the Romans do”. He further supports his claim by giving an example of cellphones which wanted to expand in China but were not able to open because they could not adhere to Bluetooth law, which was a country law. This cost the company millions of dollar. So the lecturer suggests that local law should be followed instead of international.
Secondly, the reading passage says that the American code of ethics provides better working conditions and also law dictate employees to receive livable wages which guarantees that all employees of American are fairly compensated. This runs the against the lecturer's claim which says the American standard of living wages are very high then compare to other countries. He gives an example of Mexico, in which American employees were paid double then the Mexican people. This resulted into large number of Mexican people leaving the company since they were not able to meet up the American code of uniform ethics as company did not pay them well.
Finally, the reading passage states that it is benefical by implanting American policies abroad. This contrast the lecturer's claim that if they implement such policies aboard, It might hurt the sentiments of the local people of that country . He supports his claim by giving example of one course of sexual harassment which is mandatory to do according to the code of ethics, has hurt many people sentiments.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-16 | Hrushikesh_Vaddoriya | 3 | view |
| 2023-07-16 | Hrushikesh_Vaddoriya | 3 | view |
| 2023-04-16 | rsheth05 | 80 | view |
| 2023-04-09 | prakriti malla | 90 | view |
| 2022-11-07 | GRACE_047 | 73 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following People will have more leisure time in the future than they do today Use reasons and examples to support your answer 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following People will have more leisure time in the future than they do today Use reasons and examples to support your answer 60
- Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they cast doubt on specific points made in the reading passage 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Life today is easier and more convenient than when your grandparents were children 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following University students should not be required to attend classes Taking a final exam or writing a final paper should be the only requirement Give reasons and examples to support your opinion 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 143, Rule ID: ALSO_SENT_END[1]
Message: 'Also' is not used at the end of the sentence. Use 'as well' instead.
Suggestion: as well
...code of American ethics internationally also. The lecturer casts the doubt on the re...
^^^^
Line 1, column 293, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...h uniform code of ethics internationally . According to the reading text, one of ...
^^
Line 4, column 240, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ents of the local people of that country . He supports his claim by giving example...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, if, second, secondly, so, then, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 22.412803532 98% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 30.3222958057 142% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1607.0 1373.03311258 117% => OK
No of words: 312.0 270.72406181 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15064102564 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20279927342 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67705612154 2.5805825403 104% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 145.348785872 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.525641025641 0.540411800872 97% => OK
syllable_count: 510.3 419.366225166 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 3.25607064018 246% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 8.23620309051 61% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.8876768265 49.2860985944 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.785714286 110.228320801 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2857142857 21.698381199 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 7.06452816374 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.113961241491 0.272083759551 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0474192369056 0.0996497079465 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0448272276 0.0662205650399 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0822524638578 0.162205337803 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.035934473883 0.0443174109184 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.3589403974 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 53.8541721854 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.0289183223 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.89 12.2367328918 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.27 8.42419426049 98% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 63.6247240618 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.7273730684 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.