Some people think learning history in school is important. Others think learning subjects more relevant to life is
important. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Education is a matter of debate on global scale. These days, while some people hold the belief that history plays an integral part in education, it is argued that students ought to learn other subjects that are more useful in real life. This essay will demonstrate the two opinions from overall perspectives and show my view on this matter.
First of all, the essential role of teaching history in school is undeniable. Students need to know their ethnic roots and cultural traditions, especially their own countries, to spread their national cultures to other regions. For instance, after studying history, Vietnamese students can know the unique culture of the country so that they can introduce to friends around the world. Moreover, studying history also helps us to know the achievements in many fields in the past, which leads to plenty of improvements later. In other words, with the absence of history, people cannot know a lot of great inventions that have revolutionized their lives to improve them. In general, the advantages of learning history seem inevitable in the mentioned cases.
On the other hand, the role of practical subjects is also indispensable. Studying such subjects enable learners to have more real-life skills and future job opportunities. Evidence for this is that almost all companies these days have a high demand for acquiring knowledge that has practical applications. As a result, there are some unemployed people due to their lack of practical skills which can learn from the subjects relevant to life. In addition, thank to these subjects, people can create more high-tech devices to better their living qualities. Consequently, those above are the convincing grounds for the need of practical subjects.
In conclusion, although learning ancient times in school is essential, I firmly hold the view that subjects relevant to life have more benefits. However, students should be encouraged to study all subjects and decide which subjects are more promising later.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-24 | manhdataim | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-31 | dieulinhxinhgai | 78 | view |
| 2023-05-31 | Đoàn Ngô Quốc Anh | 73 | view |
| 2023-05-31 | Đoàn Ngô Quốc Anh | 73 | view |
- Some people believe that everyone has a right to have access to university education and that governments should make it free for all students no matter what financial background they have To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- Some people think that everyone has the right to have access to university education and that governments should make it free for all students no matter what financial background they have To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 78
- Some people believe that everyone has a right to have access to university education and that governments should make it free for all students no matter what financial background they have To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- Some people think reading stories in books is better than watching TV or playing computer games for children To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Some people believe that everyone has a right to have access to university education and that governments should make it free for all students no matter what financial background they have To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, however, if, moreover, so, while, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in general, as a result, first of all, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1686.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 320.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26875 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22948505376 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75056102232 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565625 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 511.2 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.86295463 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.1764705882 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8235294118 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.2941176471 7.06120827912 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.242188297467 0.244688304435 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0773201093121 0.084324248473 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0765985442697 0.0667982634062 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160718969207 0.151304729494 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0510558527021 0.056905535591 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.67 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.