Many manufactured food and drink products contain high levels of sugar, which causes many health problems. Sugary products should be made more expensive to encourage people to consume less sugar. To what extent do you agree or disagree ? write at least 250 words
Some researches and articles suppose that convenience food which is produced in an industrial method such as energy drink, contains too much sweetness and carbonhydrate. This kind of food literally needs to increase the price of products to force people to reduce the amount of sugar they use. In my opinion, this statement does not make sense.
First of all, the price as well as the number of sold products definitely influence the rate of profit of the manufacturing corporation. Suppose that there is an increase in price of manufactured food and drink, and the number of consumers really reduces. If this case happens to a famous brand, the brand will soon lose their profit amount in a dramatically way. Somehow the country's economy might be partly affected.
Afterwards, I can make sure that the price increasing will lead to a dramatic source of argument, perhaps in a global basis. The main reason for my statement is people will literally find that augmenting the financial value of convenience food is not a logical idea to stop consumers from consuming high levels of sugar. In fact, the majority of carbonhydrate that human digests comes from bread, sugar-cane, jam and rice. People just eat or drink manufactured food mainly for snack. So increasing its price probably cannot successfully warn people from using too much sweetness.
For concluding, the financial value rising of convenience food is not a good method to stop people from consuming high amounts of carbonhydrate. This idea can even cause an extreme argument among consumers, and perhaps be a drawback to manufacturing businesses' profit rate, or econocmic industries of countries all over the world.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-09-06 | mrsaidovs@mail.ru | 84 | view |
| 2024-08-22 | ThHuong | 78 | view |
| 2024-08-05 | MEBC Class | view | |
| 2024-02-22 | Elahe13 | 78 | view |
| 2024-01-01 | Ahmad_off | 56 | view |
- Some students prefer to take a gap year between high school and university to work or to travel Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages 89
- Many manufactured food and drink products contain high levels of sugar which causes many health problems Sugary products should be made more expensive to encourage people to consume less sugar To what extent do you agree or disagree write at least 250 wor 67
- Living in a country where you have to speak a foreign language can cause serious social problems as well as practical problems To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement Write at leats 250 words 84
- Televised talent shows have become popular in many societies today Are these show a good method of finding talented people or are they just entertainment Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 344, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('dramatically') instead an adjective, or a noun ('way') instead of another adjective.
...d will soon lose their profit amount in a dramatically way. Somehow the countrys economy might be ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 371, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'digests'' or 'digest's'?
Suggestion: digests'; digest's
...he majority of carbonhydrate that human digests comes from bread, sugar-cane, jam and r...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, really, so, well, in fact, kind of, such as, as well as, first of all, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1406.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 275.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11272727273 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88993694346 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.56 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 439.2 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.9944917702 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.428571429 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6428571429 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.78571428571 7.06120827912 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.181983951542 0.244688304435 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.06311768269 0.084324248473 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0483261185852 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112705095966 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0196030139714 0.056905535591 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.