The real talent of a popular musician cannot accurately be assessed until the musician has been dead for several generations, so that his or her fame does not interfere with honest assessment
The letter to the editor for the West Lansburg News suggests that the West Lansburg council should not allow an access road to be built along the edge of wetlands so as to preserve the biodiversity of the region and ensure healthy environment. This suggestion is based solely on the fact that the Eastern Carpenteria lost their biodiversity when they repealed sanctuary of their region. Maintaining the biodiversity and ensuring a healthy community is important, however, more evidence is needed to evaluate the argument on repealing approval to build a road along the edge of wetlands.
Firstly, the argument is using the outcome of a region to opine that the road should not be built. It would be important to acertain that Eastern Carpenteria and West Lansburg are geographically similar. For instance, it could be that their is an industry in Eastern Carpenteria and when they repealed the santuary, the company used the area as a refuse dump leading to increase death of the sea otter, whereas West Lansburg does not have an industry and only plan on building road. If this were the case, the argument would not hold and more evidence would be needed to show similarities between the tow regions.
Secondly, the Eastern carpenteria santuary was repealed in 1978 whereas that of West Lansburg is up for debate in 2004. Using the result of a finding in 1978 to judged that of 2004 may not be accurate because there might have been an environmental disaster that led to a decline in the population of the sea otter and affected the safety of the environment, and repealing the santuary may not have influenced this result. Therefore, more evidence to clarify if a natural disaster occured during that period before the data could be used to judge that of West Lansburg.
Furthermore, the type of residents in both region may be different. Those in Eastern carpenteria may not be environmentally conscious whereas those living in Western Lansburg may be. If this were the case, building a road would not affect the biodiversity nor will it influence the health of the environment negatively. In fact, it could make the residents of West lansburg to be actively more involved in environmental sanitation leading to better community. Therefore, more evidence would be needed to assess the type of residents in both region before using the result of one region to influence decision in another.
In conclusion, more evidence is needed before the santuary should not be repealed.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-03 | Gbangbala Usman | 58 | view |
| 2023-08-28 | Gnyana | 50 | view |
| 2023-08-17 | Jbrachael | 66 | view |
| 2023-08-05 | Ataraxia-m | 62 | view |
| 2023-08-05 | Ataraxia-m | 50 | view |
- The tufted groundhog lives in the coastal wetlands of West Lansburg Ancient records suggest that the tufted groundhog once numbered in the millions Since they were declared a wildlife sanctuary in 2004 development along the coastal wetlands has been prohi 66
- Sports stars movie stars have an obligation to behave as role models for the young people who look up to them In return for the millions of dollars that they are paid we should expect them to fulfill this societal responsibility 66
- The following is part of a memorandum from the president of Humana University Last year the number of students who enrolled in online degree programs offered by nearby Omni University increased by 50 percent During the same year Omni showed a significant 66
- The following is a memorandum from the business manager of a television station Over the past year our late night news program has devoted increased time to national news and less time to weather and local news During this time period most of the complain 66
- The real talent of a popular musician cannot accurately be assessed until the musician has been dead for several generations so that his or her fame does not interfere with honest assessment 50
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 164, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
... to be built along the edge of wetlands so as to preserve the biodiversity of the regio...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 185, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e edge of wetlands so as to preserve the biodiversity of the region and ensure he...
^^
Line 3, column 236, Rule ID: THEIR_IS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'there'?
Suggestion: there
...similar. For instance, it could be that their is an industry in Eastern Carpenteria a...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 215, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...f 2004 may not be accurate because there might have been an environmental disaste...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, whereas, as to, for instance, in conclusion, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 19.5258426966 128% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 12.4196629213 145% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 33.0505617978 76% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 58.6224719101 99% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 12.9106741573 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2074.0 2235.4752809 93% => OK
No of words: 415.0 442.535393258 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.99759036145 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51348521516 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82087896003 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 215.323595506 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.421686746988 0.4932671777 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 659.7 704.065955056 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.132177068 60.3974514979 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.625 118.986275619 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.9375 23.4991977007 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.25 5.21951772744 158% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 10.2758426966 39% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0794230196219 0.243740707755 33% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0308294664961 0.0831039109588 37% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0189519931494 0.0758088955206 25% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0487088288148 0.150359130593 32% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0141058675201 0.0667264976115 21% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 14.1392134831 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 48.8420337079 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 12.1743820225 107% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 12.1639044944 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.41 8.38706741573 100% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 100.480337079 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 164, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
... to be built along the edge of wetlands so as to preserve the biodiversity of the regio...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 185, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e edge of wetlands so as to preserve the biodiversity of the region and ensure he...
^^
Line 3, column 236, Rule ID: THEIR_IS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'there'?
Suggestion: there
...similar. For instance, it could be that their is an industry in Eastern Carpenteria a...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 215, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...f 2004 may not be accurate because there might have been an environmental disaste...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, whereas, as to, for instance, in conclusion, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 19.5258426966 128% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 12.4196629213 145% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 33.0505617978 76% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 58.6224719101 99% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 12.9106741573 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2074.0 2235.4752809 93% => OK
No of words: 415.0 442.535393258 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.99759036145 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51348521516 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82087896003 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 215.323595506 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.421686746988 0.4932671777 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 659.7 704.065955056 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.132177068 60.3974514979 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.625 118.986275619 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.9375 23.4991977007 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.25 5.21951772744 158% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 10.2758426966 39% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0794230196219 0.243740707755 33% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0308294664961 0.0831039109588 37% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0189519931494 0.0758088955206 25% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0487088288148 0.150359130593 32% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0141058675201 0.0667264976115 21% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 14.1392134831 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 48.8420337079 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 12.1743820225 107% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 12.1639044944 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.41 8.38706741573 100% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 100.480337079 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.