Some people believe that governments should pay full course fees for students who want to study in universities. Do you agree or disagree with this statement?
It is argued that tuition fees for all students who desire to pursue tertiary education ought to be shouldered by the state. I mostly agree with this notion since it can provide better chances for such education for less well-off individuals and reduce socio-economic inequality, although it can put pressure on the state budget.
The first justification why I agree that the government should bear the tuition fees for university students is that they can be offered equal opportunities for pursuing further education. More specifically, those who live under the poverty line could afford courses at the university without worrying about their financial burden. To illustrate, without being financially supported by the state, most students from remote areas in Vietnam such as Ha Giang Province cannot afford university tuition fees and instead opt to do farming work, losing their chance to acquire a bachelor’s degree which can be beneficial to their future careers.
Another reason for my agreement is that this practice can bridge the gap between different classes in society. This is because people from disadvantaged backgrounds can avoid making sacrifices to save for their children’s education and allocate their budgets to other key matters such as healthcare and entertainment, enabling them to access the same facilities and services as those from better-endowed families. As a result, the socio-economic gap between individuals and families would likely be lessened, paying the way to an equal community.
However, subsidizing tuition fees for all students can trigger monetary burdens on the government. To be more specific, this requires greater spending allocation to education, potentially leading to a budget deficit for other key sectors such as national defence and commerce.
In conclusion, while I admit that fully subsidizing college tuition can pose pressure on the state budget, I am mostly of the opinion that it is beneficial due to the provision of equal chances for education for future generations and the reduced gap between social classes. It is advisable that the government should give priority to those from families with lower incomes to reduce budget pressure.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-05 | UNB ADMIRAL | 89 | view |
| 2023-08-05 | UNB ADMIRAL | 71 | view |
| 2023-05-24 | vuhungbo | 84 | view |
| 2023-05-15 | hieu13092006 | 73 | view |
| 2023-04-06 | Dinosaur | 73 | view |
- Some people believe that governments should pay full course fees for students who want to study in universities Do you agree or disagree with this statement 71
- These day people are so dependent on facilities such as washing machines or dishwasher As a result they are being lazy to do things by themselves What are the affects of these facilities and what problems will this create in the future 82
- The table below shows population figures for four countries for 2003 and projected figures for 2025 and 2050 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- In many countries obesity and unhealthy eating habits are increasing What are the reasons for this trend What is the most effective way to prevent it 78
- In many countries obesity and unhealthy eating habits are increasing What are the reasons for this trend What is the most effective way to prevent it 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 77, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lly subsidizing college tuition can pose pressure on the state budget, I am mostl...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, so, well, while, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1872.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 343.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.45772594752 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30351707066 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94212290269 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565597667638 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 585.9 506.74238477 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 72.5480683562 49.4020404114 147% => OK
Chars per sentence: 156.0 106.682146367 146% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.5833333333 20.7667163134 138% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06120827912 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.212255866161 0.244688304435 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0857055391257 0.084324248473 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0481314966387 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119817589529 0.151304729494 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0413508984406 0.056905535591 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.6 13.0946893788 142% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.6 50.2224549098 69% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.98 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.72 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.