• Task 2: The use of social media (e.g. Facebook and Twitter) is replacing face-to-face contact for many people in everyday life. Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages?
Nowadays, social media such as Facebook and Twitter are more and more prominent than face-to-face contact in daily life. Although this phenomenon brings some drawbacks, I believe that its benefits are more substantial.
On the one hand, using social media is accompanied with unavoidable disadvantages discussed below. To begin with, people who frequently use social media are inclined to have vision problems. To be more specific, they must use smartphones, laptops and so on in order to join online platforms so that they are excessively exposed to high energy visible detrimental to human’s eyes. In addition, users can be cheated through Facebook or Twitter. For example, a lot of Vietnameses lost millions of VNĐ through online money transfer by crimes when they resort to creating AI faces, stealing private information.
On the other hand, there are some merits that can overshadow those analysed negative effects. Firstly, thanks to social media, users can connect with people all over the world despite the geographical distance. Hence, it contributes to not only encouraging people exploring distinct cultures, languages but also enhancing the relationships between countries. Secondly, it is cost-effective and time-consuming for people to meet through social media. As opposed to face-to-face contact, online meetings can be organised successfully without any preparation about revenues, transportation that usually cost a large amount of money. Moreover, with only clicking on the button, people can organise or join any online meeting so there is no need to go to the meeting place and they can free up time to do recreation activities.
In conclusion, for all the reasons mentioned above, it seems that the merits of using social media is more significant than its demerits.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-07 | wittymickey | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-16 | annenguyen0203 | 67 | view |
| 2023-08-10 | hien3112 | 84 | view |
| 2023-07-07 | meemeemee | 82 | view |
| 2023-06-04 | hieu13092006 | 56 | view |
- Task 1 The two bar charts below show the proportion of 14 16 year old students studying a foreign language in an English speaking country and the top three foreign languages Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make c 78
- Task 1 The percentage of people who were born in Australia and who were born outside Australia living in urban rural and town between 1995 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting this main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Task 2 More and more people no longer read newspapers or watch TV programs to get news They get news about the world through the Internet Is this a positive or negative development 61
- Task 2 Some people believe that no one should do the same job for all their working life Others argue that doing the same job brings advantages for individuals companies and society Discuss both views and give your opinion 67
- Task 1 The graph below shows the production of three forest industry products in a European country namely timber pulp and paper from 1980 to 2000 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...is more significant than its demerits.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1525.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 279.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.46594982079 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99567825466 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.63082437276 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 479.7 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.2879938565 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.928571429 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9285714286 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.8571428571 7.06120827912 154% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.274284647122 0.244688304435 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0935138267406 0.084324248473 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0798828093184 0.0667982634062 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165279421196 0.151304729494 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0495613150258 0.056905535591 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.9 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.