• Task 2: If old people are no longer physically, mentally or financially able to look after themselves, younger family members should be legally responsible for supporting them. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is believed that old people do not have the physical, mental or financial ability of looking after themselves, younger family members should be under obligation to support them. In my opinion, I totally concur with this attitude for some reason I would discuss below.
It is suitable for moral principles when people help their older family members. To begin with, the main reason is that it is said to be a way of revealing gratitude of descendants to older members as before that, parents or grandparents devoted themselves in order to nurture children such as working overtime. Hence, their health has more and more deteriorated so when they are not able to look after themselves, it is necessary for younger members to care for them. In addition, helping old family members is a good way of showing loves to them and contributing to one of the traditional precious personalities of humans. In the long run, this phenomenon will enhance humanity and civilization as well.
Moreover, looking after old people brings a brighter future for them. First, the living standard of them can improve significantly thanks to the support of the younger members. Because of not having the ability to care for themselves, they struggle with a host of daily life difficulties, for example expensive living costs, doing housework and so on and it is really a blessing for them to be given the hand of descendants. Consequently, the number of homeless old people show a sharp decrease. Second, thanks to descendants always standing by old people, they can get rid of feelings of loneliness, boredom. That will enhance the mental health of them and reduce the rate of suicide in old people.
In conclusion, it is advisable for people to look after their older family members when they can not live independently.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-03 | hien3112 | 56 | view |
| 2023-08-16 | thuthao2000 | 87 | view |
| 2023-07-30 | Dương Viết Phương Huyền | 61 | view |
| 2023-07-28 | cupinsiuway | 84 | view |
| 2023-06-19 | Amanda Helen | 78 | view |
- Task 1 The plan below shows a school in 1985 and the school now Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 82
- Task 1 The plans below show a bookstore in 2000 and the bookstore now Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Task 2 Some people think that it is a good thing for senior management positions to have much higher salaries than other workers in a company To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- Task 1 The plans show the change of a small theater in 2010 and 2012 73
- Task 1 The charts below show the performance of spending on roads and transport in four countries from 1990 to 2005 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisions where relevant 73
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, hence, if, look, moreover, really, second, so, well, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1503.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 303.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9603960396 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81947486391 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.528052805281 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 469.8 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.0901242717 49.4020404114 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.357142857 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6428571429 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.2142857143 7.06120827912 159% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.347424347214 0.244688304435 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121439257335 0.084324248473 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101164659716 0.0667982634062 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.231335323124 0.151304729494 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0564045919837 0.056905535591 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, hence, if, look, moreover, really, second, so, well, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1503.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 303.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9603960396 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81947486391 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.528052805281 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 469.8 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.0901242717 49.4020404114 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.357142857 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6428571429 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.2142857143 7.06120827912 159% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.347424347214 0.244688304435 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121439257335 0.084324248473 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101164659716 0.0667982634062 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.231335323124 0.151304729494 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0564045919837 0.056905535591 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.